Limitations of the World Health Organization classification of childhood supratentorial astrocytic tumors
✍ Scribed by Floyd H. Gilles; William D. Brown; Alan Leviton; C. Jane Tavaré; Lester Adelman; Lucy B. Rorke; Richard L. Davis; Tessa E. Hedley-Whyte; for the Childhood Brain Tumor Consortium
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2000
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 86 KB
- Volume
- 88
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0008-543X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
In the context of many implied but not rigorously stated histologic feature combinations, the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of astrocytic tumors specifies only the presence or absence of endothelial proliferation, necrosis, and mitosis to distinguish astrocytoma, anaplastic astrocytoma, and glioblastoma multiforme.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
I n 1973, Dr. F. K. Mostofi proposed a three-tiered system (World Health Organization [WHO] Grades 1, 2, and 3) to grade urothelial (transitional cell) carcinoma of the urinary bladder. 1 Grading was based on the degree of anaplasia of tumor cells, which was defined as increased cellularity, nuclear
## Abstract Compared with the West, the overall incidence of lymphoid neoplasms is lower, and the subtype distribution is distinct in Asia. To comprehensively investigate the subtype distribution with the age and sex factors, and temporal changes of subtype proportions, we re‐assessed all patients