Life expectancy, comorbidity and quality of life: the treatment equation in the older cancer patients
β Scribed by L. Repetto; D. Comandini; S. Mammoliti
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 2001
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 120 KB
- Volume
- 37
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1040-8428
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
With ageing, function preservation and maintenance of quality of life represent a major goal in an increasing proportion of patients. Life expectancy is a function of age, comorbidity, disability and cancer type and stage. Decision-making involves a delicate balance among all these factors, evaluation of treatment related complications of the overall effects of cancer and cancer treatment on the patients' quality of life. Despite several instruments for the assessment of quality of life being validated, none have been calibrated to the special requirements of the older patients. The structured interview administered by a trained clinician represents a standard approach for geriatric research and even for clinical practice because of the frailty of the older population. The combination of this approach with the self-administered questionnaire appears the most effective way to minimise missing data in collecting information for patients unable to complete the form.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
The role of personal expectations on reports of health-related quality of life (HRQL) in the context of a set of other variables commonly thought to affect patient report of HRQL was examined. The complete set of predictor variables included: (1) patient factors including age, gender, race, educatio
## Abstract ## Objectives/Hypothesis: To determine the effect of comorbidity on 1βyear postβtreatment quality of life (QOL) in patients with head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC). ## Methods: One hundred twentyβfive previously untreated HNSCC patients participated in longitudinal QOL analys
Background. To employ patient-reported speech outcome data collected on head and neck cancer (HNC) surveys, there is a need to determine (1) the relationship of patient ratings to speech language pathologist (SLP) ratings and (2) whether patients' attitudes toward their speech are an important eleme