𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Life cycle assessment: A comparison of three methods for impact analysis and evaluation

✍ Scribed by Henrikke Baumann; Tomas Rydberg

Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1994
Tongue
English
Weight
869 KB
Volume
2
Category
Article
ISSN
0959-6526

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis

For the evaluation of data resulting from the inventory stage of a life cycle assessment, two sets of environmental indices based on Swedish data have been calculated according to the 'ecological scarcity method' and the 'environmental theme method'. These are compared with indices from the method for 'environmental priority strategies in product design'. The relative importance of CO2, SO2 and NOx in the three evaluation methods, expressed as index ratios

πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

Comparison of different life-cycle impac
Comparison of different life-cycle impact assessment methods for aquatic ecotoxicity
✍ Carsten Schulze; Almut JΓΆdicke; Martin Scheringer; Manuele Margni; Olivier Jolli πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2001 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 195 KB

## Abstract Human and ecotoxicity impact categories are problematic to quantify within life‐cycle impact assessment (LCIA) because their local scope makes them difficult to aggregate with the traditional global‐impact categories used in life‐cycle assessment (LCA). For being able to assess local im

A comparison of three fundamentally diff
A comparison of three fundamentally different methods for generating capacity reliability evaluation
✍ L. Goel; R. Billinton πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1994 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 761 KB

This paper describes the basic concepts associated with reliability evaluation of generating systems. The concepts involved in the inclusion of generating unit forced outage rates in generating capacity adequacy assessment and the evaluation of system unsupplied energy and production costs are illus