<p>"I feel quite confident in stating that this book is likely to serve in the foreseeable future as the standard reference guide to anaphora in South Asian languages."<br><em>Michael C. Shapiro in: Journal of the American Oriental Society, 123, 1-2003</em></p>
Lexical Anaphors and Pronouns in Selected South Asian Languages: A Principled Typology
β Scribed by Barbara C. Lust, Kashi Wali, James W. Gair (eds.)
- Publisher
- Mouton de Gruyter
- Year
- 1999
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 913
- Series
- Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 22
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
This volume contains detailed descriptions of the anaphoric system of 14 languages of South Asia, representing four linguistic families, Indo-Aryan, Dravidian, Tibeto-Burman and Austro-Asiatic. The data for each language are presented in terms of a common, detailed outline which was guided by both current theoretical concerns and descriptive questions, and designed to allow both precise and comprehensive comparisons across the languages. Each language is described by a recognized specialist.
β¦ Subjects
Foreign Language Dictionaries & Thesauruses;Foreign Language Study & Reference;Reference;Linguistics;Words, Language & Grammar;Reference
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
South Asian languages: a preview -- Lexical anaphors and pronouns in South Asian languages -- Case and agreement -- Non-nominative subjects -- Complementation -- Backward control -- Noun modifiers and relative clauses.;Explores the similarities and differences of about forty South Asian languages fr
Research on nominalization, a process that gives rise to referring expressions, has always played a central role in linguistic investigations. Over the years there has also been growing evidence that nominalization constructions often extend to non-referential domains. They participate in noun-modif
<p>The internal bootstrapps for establishing the grammatical system of a human language build an essential topic in language acquisition research. The discussion of the last 20 years came up with the Lexical Bootstrapping Hypothesis which assigns lexical development the role of the central bootstrap