𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Leverage in Bayesian Regression

✍ Scribed by Bert M. Steece


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1989
Tongue
English
Weight
425 KB
Volume
31
Category
Article
ISSN
0323-3847

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Using the concept of an extended data set (ZIELLNEB, 1986). we derived the projection or hat matrix for Bayeaien regreasion analysis. The hat matrix shows how much influence or leverage the observed responses and the prior means bave on each of the posterior fitted values. The amount of leverage essociated with the observed data is shown to be a monotonically decreasing function of the ratio of the process variance to the prior variance. Additional properties of the Bayesian hat matrix are discussed. Two illustrative examples are presented.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Bayesian quantile regression
✍ Keming Yu; Rana A. Moyeed πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2001 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 209 KB
Principal regression analysis and the in
✍ Pierre-Alain Reigneron; Romain Allez; Jean-Philippe Bouchaud πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2011 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 348 KB

We revisit the index leverage effect, that can be decomposed into a volatility effect and a correlation effect. We investigate the latter using a matrix regression analysis, that we call 'Principal Regression Analysis' (PRA) and for which we provide some analytical (using Random Matrix Theory) and n

Bayesian quantile regression methods
✍ Tony Lancaster; Sung Jae Jun πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 384 KB

## Abstract This paper is a study of the application of Bayesian exponentially tilted empirical likelihood to inference about quantile regressions. In the case of simple quantiles we show the exact form for the likelihood implied by this method and compare it with the Bayesian bootstrap and with Je

Large Bayesian vector auto regressions
✍ Marta BaΕ„bura; Domenico Giannone; Lucrezia Reichlin πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2010 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 329 KB

## Abstract This paper shows that vector auto regression (VAR) with Bayesian shrinkage is an appropriate tool for large dynamic models. We build on the results of De Mol and co‐workers (2008) and show that, when the degree of shrinkage is set in relation to the cross‐sectional dimension, the foreca