𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Letter 3: Randomized clinical trial of antibiotic therapy versus appendicectomy as primary treatment of acute appendicitis in unselected patients (Br J Surg 2009; 96: 473–481)

✍ Scribed by V. Patel; K. Ahmed; H. Ashrafian

Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2009
Tongue
English
Weight
56 KB
Volume
96
Category
Article
ISSN
0007-1323

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Letter 3: Randomized clinical trial of a
Letter 3: Randomized clinical trial of antibiotic therapy versus appendicectomy as primary treatment of acute appendicitis in unselected patients (Br J Surg 2009; 96: 473–481)
✍ B. B. Agarwal 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 80 KB 👁 2 views

The Editors welcome topical correspondence from readers relating to articles published in the Journal. Responses should be sent electronically via the BJS website (www.bjs.co.uk). All letters will be reviewed and, if approved, appear on the website. A selection of these will be edited and published

Letter 6: Randomized clinical trial of a
Letter 6: Randomized clinical trial of antibiotic therapy versus appendicectomy as primary treatment of acute appendicitis in unselected patients (Br J Surg 2009; 96: 473–481)
✍ A. G. Paice; H. Ali 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 55 KB 👁 2 views

The study is well conducted as per consort statement but weakened by the fact that there is high crossover in treatment groups especially in the antibiotic group. In particular 96 cases which were allocated to the antibiotic group were subsequently converted to surgery. In more than half (45) of the

Letter 1: Randomized clinical trial of a
Letter 1: Randomized clinical trial of antibiotic therapy versus appendicectomy as primary treatment of acute appendicitis in unselected patients (Br J Surg 2009; 96: 473–481)
✍ C. P. Spanos 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 80 KB 👁 2 views

## Abstract The Editors welcome topical correspondence from readers relating to articles published in the Journal. Responses should be sent electronically via the BJS website (www.bjs.co.uk). All letters will be reviewed and, if approved, appear on the website. A selection of these will be edited a