## Abstract The Editors welcome topical correspondence from readers relating to articles published in the Journal. Responses should be sent electronically via the BJS website (www.bjs.co.uk). All letters will be reviewed and, if approved, appear on the website. A selection of these will be edited a
Letter 2: Short-term outcomes from a prospective randomized trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer (Br J Surg 2009; 96: 1458–1467)
✍ Scribed by T. Fujita
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2010
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 90 KB
- Volume
- 97
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0007-1323
- DOI
- 10.1002/bjs.7065
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract ## Background Randomized trials in low-risk populations have failed to show any benefit for laparoscopic compared with open colorectal resection in terms of morbidity. Furthermore, it is not known whether laparoscopic colorectal resection would yield advantages if randomization were re
The Editors welcome topical correspondence from readers relating to articles published in the Journal. Responses should be sent electronically via the BJS website (www.bjs.co.uk). All letters will be reviewed and, if approved, appear on the website. A selection of these will be edited and published