✦ LIBER ✦

Letter 1: Randomized clinical trial of ultrasonic versus electrocautery dissection of the gallbladder in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (Br J Surg 2003; 90: 799-803)

✍ Scribed by M. Morino

Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 2003
Tongue: English
Weight: 48 KB
Volume: 90
Category: Article
ISSN: 0007-1323
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.4419

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis

Abstract

The Editors welcome topical correspondence from readers relating to articles published in the Journal. Responses can be sent electronically via the BJS website (www.bjs.co.uk) or by post. All letters will be reviewed and, if approved, appear on the website. A selection of these will be edited and published in the Journal. Letters must be no more than 250 words in length. Letters submitted by post should be typed on A4-sized paper in double spacing and should be accompanied by a disk.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Letter 2: Randomized clinical trial of u

Letter 2: Randomized clinical trial of ultrasonic versus electrocautery dissection of the gallbladder in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (Br J Surg 2003; 90: 799-803)

✍ H. Devalia 📂 Article 📅 2003 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 46 KB 👁 1 views

Randomized clinical trial of ultrasonic

Randomized clinical trial of ultrasonic versus electrocautery dissection of the gallbladder in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

✍ I. M. C. Janssen; D. J. Swank; O. Boonstra; B. C. Knipscheer; J. H. G. Klinkenbi 📂 Article 📅 2003 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 95 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract ## Background Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is frequently complicated by gallbladder perforation and loss of bile or stones into the peritoneal cavity. The aim of this study was to compare the use of ultrasonic dissection and electrocautery with respect to the incidence of gallbladder p

Randomized trial of traditional dissecti

Randomized trial of traditional dissection with electrocautery versus ultrasonic fundus-first dissection in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (Br J Surg 2005; 92: 810-813)

✍ B. Decadt 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 51 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract The Editors welcome topical correspondence from readers relating to articles published in the Journal. Responses can be sent electronically via the BJS website (www.bjs.co.uk) or by post. All letters will be reviewed and, if approved, appear on the website. A selection of these will be

Randomized trial of traditional dissecti

Randomized trial of traditional dissection with electrocautery versus ultrasonic fundus-first dissection in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (Br J Surg 2005; 92: 810-813)

✍ W. Thaler; H. Dejaco; E. Dapunt; H. J. Marsoner 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 50 KB 👁 1 views

Author's reply (for Letter 1 see Br J Su

Author's reply (for Letter 1 see Br J Surg 2004; 91: 509–510): Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed with mini-instruments (Br J Surg 2003; 90: 1345-1348)

✍ L. Sarli 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 48 KB

Randomized clinical trial of open versus

Randomized clinical trial of open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis (Br J Surg 2005; 92: 44–49)

✍ R. Rai; A. Sinha; S. Rai 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 54 KB 👁 2 views