✦ LIBER ✦

Less Invasive Coronary Surgery: Consensus From the Oxford Meeting

✍ Scribed by Stephen Westaby; Federico J. Benetti

Book ID: 117037159
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 1996
Tongue: English
Weight: 416 KB
Volume: 62
Category: Article
ISSN: 0003-4975
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(96)00557-7

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Weathering the storm: How can thoracic s

Weathering the storm: How can thoracic surgery training programs meet the new challenges in the era of less-invasive technologies?

✍ Sunil M. Prasad; Malek G. Massad; Edgar G. Chedrawy; Norman J. Snow; Joannie T. 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 CTSNet 🌐 English ⚖ 169 KB

Using the EuroSCORE to Assess Changes in

Using the EuroSCORE to Assess Changes in the Risk Profiles of the Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Before and After the Introduction of Less Invasive Coronary Surgery

✍ Toshihiro Ohata; Mitsunori Kaneko; Toru Kuratani; Hideki Ueda; Kazuo Shimamura 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 160 KB

Less-Invasive Mitral Valve Operations: T

Less-Invasive Mitral Valve Operations: Trends and Outcomes From The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database

✍ James S. Gammie; Yue Zhao; Eric D. Peterson; Sean M. O'Brien; J. Scott Rankin; B 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 641 KB

Highlights from the 11th Annual Scientif

Highlights from the 11th Annual Scientific Meeting of the International Society for Minimally Invasive Cardiothoracic Surgery

✍ Lawrence S. Lee; Jonathan Daniel 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 CTSNet 🌐 English ⚖ 66 KB

Intramedullary and total femur replaceme

Intramedullary and total femur replacement in revision arthroplasty as a last limb-saving option: Is there any benefit from the less invasive intramedullary replacement?

✍ Hoell, S.; Butschek, S.; Gosheger, G.; Dedy, N.; Dieckmann, R.; Henrichs, M.; Da 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 🌐 English ⚖ 721 KB

Trial finds stenting for multivessel dis

Trial finds stenting for multivessel disease is less costly than bypass grafting, but more likely to require repeat revascularisation: Abstracted from: Legrand VM, Serruys PW, Unger F, et al. Three-year outcome after coronary stenting versus bypass surgery for the treatment of multivessel disease. Circulation 2004; 109: 1114–20.

📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 126 KB