๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Lens development. I. Role of the lens in eye growth

โœ Scribed by Coulombre, Alfred J. ;Coulombre, Jane L.


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1964
Tongue
English
Weight
586 KB
Volume
156
Category
Article
ISSN
0022-104X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Fibroblast growth factor receptors and r
โœ David S. McDevitt; Samir K. Brahma; Yves Courtois; Jean-Claude Jeanny ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1997 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 232 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

If the eye lens of the adult newt, Notophthalmus viridescens, is removed, a new lens will regenerate and only from the dorsal, not the ventral, iris. The source, pigmented epithelial cells, would normally no longer divide, but upon lentectomy they do re-enter the cell cycle and form lens. The cause

Roles of maf family proteins in lens dev
โœ Hasan Mahmud Reza; Kunio Yasuda ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2004 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 326 KB

## Abstract Lens provides a good model for studying developmental cues relevant to cellular and molecular interactions. Basic region/leucine zipper (bZIP) transcription factors have been found to play key roles during eye formation in various species, including human, mouse, rat, __Xenopus__, zebra

Intracellular localization of lens antig
โœ Van De Kamp, Maarten ;Zwaan, Johan ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1973 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 869 KB

## Abstract The time of initial synthesis and the subsequent localization of the crystallins in the embryonic mouse lens were studied with antisera to adult mouse lens using the indirect fluorescent antibody technique. Fluorescence was first detected in a few centrally located cells of deeply invag

Critical development? Using a critical t
โœ Sarah Zeller-Berkman ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2010 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 69 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

## Abstract A critical theory lens is used to explore the role of evaluation in youth development, a field aimed at recognizing youth as assets. A theory of change in the field is questioned for its emphasis on individual youth outcomes as programmatic outcome measures. A review of 209 evaluations