Legitimacy, Illegitimacy, and the Right to Rule: Windows on Abimelechโs Rise and Demise in Judges 9
โ Scribed by Gordon K. Oeste
- Publisher
- Bloomsbury T&T Clark
- Year
- 2011
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 288
- Series
- The Library of Hebrew Bible/Old Testament Studies
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
This book explores the portrayal of the rise, reign, and demise of Abimelech in Judges 9 and asks about whose interests this portrayal may have served. The negative depiction of Abimelechโs kingship in this chapter, coupled with Gideonโs rejection of kingship in Judges 8:22โ23, has led interpreters to view the passage as anti-monarchic. This perspective clashes with the pro-monarchic stance of Judges 17โ21. However, while the portrayal of Abimelechโs kingship is negative, it may yet have served as a legitimation strategy for the monarchy. In support, this study examines Judges 9 through three methodological lenses: a narrative analysis, a rhetorical analysis and a social scientific analysis.
In addition, anthropological data on early and developing states shows that such states attempt to prevent fissioning (the tendency inherent within political systems to break up and form other similar units) by subverting local leaders, groups, and institutions, and so legitimate the centralization of power. When read in this light, Judges 9 supports monarchic interests by seeking to subvert localized rule and alliances in favor of a centralized polity.
โฆ Table of Contents
CONTENTS
Acknowledgments
Abbreviations
Chapter 1. LOOKING AT JUDGES 9 THROUGH MULTIPLE SIGHT LINES
1.
The Value of Multiple Sight Lines
2.
Reading the Narrative Interests of Judges 9
3. Reading the Rhetoric of Judges 9
4.
Monarchic Context
5.
The Social Context of Judges 9
6.
Combining the Sight Lines
Chapter 2.
APPROACHES TO ABIMELECH AND JUDGES 9
1. Redactional Studies
2. Social-Scientific Studies
3. Ideological Studies
4. Literary-Holistic Studies
5. Summary
Chapter 3.
NARRATIVE ANALYSIS OF JUDGES 9
1. Judges 9 and the Gideon Narrative (Judges 6โ8)
2. The Narrative Structure of Judges 9
3. Narrative Analysis of Judges 9
Excursus: Safety Inside the CityโDanger Outside the City
4. Conclusions
Chapter 4. READING THE RHETORIC OF JUDGES 9
1. The Rhetoric of the Exposition in Judges 9:1โ6
2. The Rhetoric of the Complication in Judges 9:7โ22
3. The Rhetoric of the Change in Judges 9:23โ24
4. The Rhetoric of the Unravellng in Judges 9:25โ55
5. The Rhetoric of the Conclusion of Judges 9:56โ57
6. Summary of the Rhetorical Strategy of Judges 9
7. The Rhetorical Situation Implied by Judges 9
Chapter 5.
THE SOCIAL WORLD(S) OF JUDGES 9
1. A Social-Scientific Analysis of the Story World of Judges 9
2. Social-Scientific Analysis of the World of the Implied Author
3. Implications for the Role of Judges 9 in the Book of Judges
4. Summary
Chapter 6.
CONCLUSION
1. The Contribution of Each Method
2. Combining the Sight Lines
Bibliography
Index of References
Index of Authors
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
What makes a government legitimate? The dominant view is that our public officials have the right to rule us, even if they are unfit or unfair, as long as they gain power through procedures based on our consent. In Legitimacy, Arthur Applbaum argues that adherence to procedure is not enough, that le
What makes a government legitimate? Arthur Isak Applbaum rigorously argues that the greatest threat to democracies today is not loss of basic rights or despotism. It is the tyranny of unreason: domination of citizens by incoherent, inconstant, incontinent rulers. A government that cannot govern itse
<p>What makes a government legitimate? Arthur Isak Applbaum rigorously argues that the greatest threat to democracies today is not loss of basic rights or despotism. It is the tyranny of unreason: domination of citizens by incoherent, inconstant, incontinent rulers. A government that cannot govern i
Military legitimacy concerns the delicate balance between might and right. It begins with the law - operational law (OPLAW) and the law of war (LAW) - but it goes beyond the law to its moral underpinnings. Moral and cultural standards in the area of operations must be respected to ensure legitimacy.
Animated by scandals, scoundrels and imposters, thisย collection, with contributions from prominent scholars of literature, history and law,ย seeks to address issues of identity, trust and deception in eighteenth- and nineteenth-century Britain through the optic of the twin concepts of legitimacy and