๐”– Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

๐Ÿ“

Legitimacy, Illegitimacy, and the Right to Rule: Windows on Abimelechโ€™s Rise and Demise in Judges 9

โœ Scribed by Gordon K. Oeste


Publisher
Bloomsbury T&T Clark
Year
2011
Tongue
English
Leaves
288
Series
The Library of Hebrew Bible/Old Testament Studies
Category
Library

โฌ‡  Acquire This Volume

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


This book explores the portrayal of the rise, reign, and demise of Abimelech in Judges 9 and asks about whose interests this portrayal may have served. The negative depiction of Abimelechโ€™s kingship in this chapter, coupled with Gideonโ€™s rejection of kingship in Judges 8:22โ€“23, has led interpreters to view the passage as anti-monarchic. This perspective clashes with the pro-monarchic stance of Judges 17โ€“21. However, while the portrayal of Abimelechโ€™s kingship is negative, it may yet have served as a legitimation strategy for the monarchy. In support, this study examines Judges 9 through three methodological lenses: a narrative analysis, a rhetorical analysis and a social scientific analysis.
In addition, anthropological data on early and developing states shows that such states attempt to prevent fissioning (the tendency inherent within political systems to break up and form other similar units) by subverting local leaders, groups, and institutions, and so legitimate the centralization of power. When read in this light, Judges 9 supports monarchic interests by seeking to subvert localized rule and alliances in favor of a centralized polity.

โœฆ Table of Contents


CONTENTS
Acknowledgments
Abbreviations
Chapter 1. LOOKING AT JUDGES 9 THROUGH MULTIPLE SIGHT LINES
1.
The Value of Multiple Sight Lines
2.
Reading the Narrative Interests of Judges 9
3. Reading the Rhetoric of Judges 9
4.
Monarchic Context
5.
The Social Context of Judges 9
6.
Combining the Sight Lines
Chapter 2.
APPROACHES TO ABIMELECH AND JUDGES 9
1. Redactional Studies
2. Social-Scientific Studies
3. Ideological Studies
4. Literary-Holistic Studies
5. Summary
Chapter 3.
NARRATIVE ANALYSIS OF JUDGES 9
1. Judges 9 and the Gideon Narrative (Judges 6โ€“8)
2. The Narrative Structure of Judges 9
3. Narrative Analysis of Judges 9
Excursus: Safety Inside the Cityโ€”Danger Outside the City
4. Conclusions
Chapter 4. READING THE RHETORIC OF JUDGES 9
1. The Rhetoric of the Exposition in Judges 9:1โ€“6
2. The Rhetoric of the Complication in Judges 9:7โ€“22
3. The Rhetoric of the Change in Judges 9:23โ€“24
4. The Rhetoric of the Unravellng in Judges 9:25โ€“55
5. The Rhetoric of the Conclusion of Judges 9:56โ€“57
6. Summary of the Rhetorical Strategy of Judges 9
7. The Rhetorical Situation Implied by Judges 9
Chapter 5.
THE SOCIAL WORLD(S) OF JUDGES 9
1. A Social-Scientific Analysis of the Story World of Judges 9
2. Social-Scientific Analysis of the World of the Implied Author
3. Implications for the Role of Judges 9 in the Book of Judges
4. Summary
Chapter 6.
CONCLUSION
1. The Contribution of Each Method
2. Combining the Sight Lines
Bibliography
Index of References
Index of Authors


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Legitimacy: The Right to Rule in a Wanto
โœ Arthur Isak Applbaum ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2021 ๐Ÿ› Harvard University Press ๐ŸŒ English

What makes a government legitimate? The dominant view is that our public officials have the right to rule us, even if they are unfit or unfair, as long as they gain power through procedures based on our consent. In Legitimacy, Arthur Applbaum argues that adherence to procedure is not enough, that le

Legitimacy: The Right to Rule in a Wanto
โœ Arthur Isak Applbaum ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2019 ๐Ÿ› Harvard University Press ๐ŸŒ English

What makes a government legitimate? Arthur Isak Applbaum rigorously argues that the greatest threat to democracies today is not loss of basic rights or despotism. It is the tyranny of unreason: domination of citizens by incoherent, inconstant, incontinent rulers. A government that cannot govern itse

Legitimacy: The Right to Rule in a Wanto
โœ Arthur Isak Applbaum ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2019 ๐Ÿ› Harvard University Press ๐ŸŒ English

<p>What makes a government legitimate? Arthur Isak Applbaum rigorously argues that the greatest threat to democracies today is not loss of basic rights or despotism. It is the tyranny of unreason: domination of citizens by incoherent, inconstant, incontinent rulers. A government that cannot govern i

Military Legitimacy: Might and Right in
โœ Rudolph C. Barnes ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 1996 ๐Ÿ› Frank Cass ๐ŸŒ English

Military legitimacy concerns the delicate balance between might and right. It begins with the law - operational law (OPLAW) and the law of war (LAW) - but it goes beyond the law to its moral underpinnings. Moral and cultural standards in the area of operations must be respected to ensure legitimacy.

Legitimacy and Illegitimacy in Nineteent
โœ Margot Finn, Michael Lobban, Jenny Bourne Taylor ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2010 ๐Ÿ› Palgrave Macmillan ๐ŸŒ English

Animated by scandals, scoundrels and imposters, thisย collection, with contributions from prominent scholars of literature, history and law,ย seeks to address issues of identity, trust and deception in eighteenth- and nineteenth-century Britain through the optic of the twin concepts of legitimacy and