Deliberative democracy tends to suffer from a lack of literature from the perspective of legal theory. In this book, scholars from Europe and the United States look at the three fundamental questions raised in current deliberative theory: why deliberate, who deliberates and where to deliberate? Thus
Legal Evidence and Proof (Applied Legal Philosophy)
β Scribed by Hendrik Kaptein, Henry Prakken, Bart Verheij
- Publisher
- Ashgate
- Year
- 2009
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 303
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
As a result of recent scandals concerning evidence and proof in the administration of criminal justice - ranging from innocent people on death row in the United States to misuse of statistics leading to wrongful convictions in The Netherlands and elsewhere - inquiries into the logic of evidence and proof have taken on a new urgency both in an academic and practical sense. This study presents a broad perspective on logic by focusing on inference not just in isolation but as embedded in contexts of procedure and investigation. With special attention being paid to recent developments in Artificial Intelligence and the Law, specifically related to evidentiary reasoning, this book provides clarification of problems of logic and argumentation in relation to evidence and proof. As the vast majority of legal conflicts relate to contested facts, rather than contested law, this volume concerning facts as prime determinants of legal decisions presents an important contribution to the field for both scholars and practitioners.
β¦ Table of Contents
Contents......Page 6
Series Editorβs Preface......Page 8
List of Figures......Page 10
List of Tables......Page 12
Preface......Page 14
General Introduction......Page 16
1 Burdens of Evidence and Proof: Why Bear Them? A Plea for Principled Opportunism in (Leaving) Legal Fact-finding (Alone)......Page 30
2 The Fabrication of Facts: The Lure of the Incredible Coincidence......Page 54
3 Decision-making in the Forensic Arena......Page 86
4 Analysing Stories Using Schemes......Page 108
5 The Evaluation of Evidence: Differences between Legal Systems......Page 132
6 Inference to the Best Legal Explanation......Page 150
7 Accepting the Truth of a Story about the Facts of a Criminal Case......Page 176
8 Rigid Anarchic Principles of Evidence and Proof: Anomist Panaceas against Legal Pathologies of Proceduralism......Page 210
9 A Logical Analysis of Burdens of Proof......Page 238
10 Twelve Angry Men or One Good Woman? Asymmetric Relations in Evidentiary Reasoning......Page 270
Index......Page 298
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Contributes to the field of systems theory of law in the context of European legal and political integration and constitution-making. This book puts European legislative efforts and policies, especially the EU enlargement process, in the context of legal theory and philosophy.
Contributes to the field of systems theory of law in the context of European legal and political integration and constitution-making. This book puts European legislative efforts and policies, especially the EU enlargement process, in the context of legal theory and philosophy.
The focus of this book is the idea of equality as a moral, political and jurisprudential concept. The author is motivated primarily by a concern to better understand the conundrums which arise in the justification, interpretation and application of discrimination law. Nicholas Smith aims to provide
It has often been remarked that law and religion have much in common. One of the most conspicuous elements is that both law and religion frequently refer to a text that has authority over the members of a community. In the case of religion this text is deemed to be 'holy', in the case of law, some,