𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Left lobe adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation: Should portal inflow modulation be added?

✍ Scribed by Yoichi Ishizaki; Seiji Kawasaki; Hiroyuki Sugo; Jiro Yoshimoto; Noriko Fujiwara; Hiroshi Imamura


Book ID
102933663
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2012
Tongue
English
Weight
998 KB
Volume
18
Category
Article
ISSN
1527-6465

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Recently, the successful application of portal inflow modulation has led to renewed interest in the use of left lobe grafts in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). However, data on the hepatic hemodynamics supporting portal inflow modulation are limited, and the optimal portal circulation for a liver graft is still unclear. We analyzed 42 consecutive adultto-adult left lobe LDLT cases without splenectomy or a portocaval shunt. The mean actual graft volume (GV)/recipient standard liver volume (SLV) ratio was 39.8% 6 5.7% (median ΒΌ 38.9%, range ΒΌ 26.1%-54.0%). The actual GV/SLV ratio was less than 40% in 24 of the 42 cases, and the actual graft-to-recipient weight ratio was less than 0.8% in 17 of the 42 recipients. The mean portal vein pressure (PVP) was 23.9 6 7.6 mm Hg (median ΒΌ 23.5 mm Hg, range ΒΌ 9-38 mm Hg) before transplantation and 21.5 6 3.6 mm Hg (median ΒΌ 22 mm Hg, range ΒΌ 14-27 mm Hg) after graft implantation. The mean portal pressure gradient (PVP Γ€ central venous pressure) was 14.5 6 6.8 mm Hg (median ΒΌ 13.5 mm Hg, range ΒΌ 3-26 mm Hg) before transplantation and 12.4 6 4.4 mm Hg (median ΒΌ 13 mm Hg, range ΒΌ 1-21 mm Hg) after graft implantation. The mean posttransplant portal vein flow was 301 6 167 mL/minute/100 g of liver in the 38 recipients for whom it was measured. None of the recipients developed small-for-size syndrome, and all were discharged from the hospital despite portal hyperperfusion. The overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year patient and graft survival rates were 100%, 97%, and 91%, respectively. In conclusion, LDLT with a left liver graft without splenectomy or a portocaval shunt yields good long-term results for adult patients with a minimal donor burden.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Endovascular closure of a hemiportocaval
✍ Jean F. Botha; B. Daniel Campos; Jason Johanning; David Mercer; Wendy Grant; Ala πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 220 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

Adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation is an accepted treatment option for patients with end-stage liver disease. It is generally acknowledged that a graft weight to recipient body weight ratio > 0.8 is required in order to prevent the development of small-for-size syndrome. Size mismatch

Left lobe adult-to-adult living donor li
✍ Jean F. Botha; Alan N. Langnas; B. Daniel Campos; Wendy J. Grant; Christopher E. πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2010 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 298 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

Adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (AA-LDLT) has better outcomes when a graft weight to recipient weight ratio (GW/RW) > 0.8 is selected. A smaller GW/RW may result in small-for-size syndrome (SFSS). Portal inflow modulation seems to effectively prevent SFSS. Donor right hepatectomy i