๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Learning technology and usability: a framework for understanding courseware

โœ Scribed by J.T Mayes; C.J Fowler


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1999
Tongue
English
Weight
81 KB
Volume
11
Category
Article
ISSN
0953-5438

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


This paper argues that the usability of educational software cannot be measured in the same terms as other work contexts. This is because learning is a by-product of understanding rather than an activity which can be supported directly. Although it is best achieved through the performance of meaningful tasks, these tasks need to be designed to support different kinds of learning. We approach the problem through an attempt to derive a framework for understanding courseware. Conceptual learning is characterized as a cycle, involving the three stages which we term conceptualization, construction and dialogue. These are mapped onto primary, secondary and tertiary courseware. Each kind of courseware is discussed in terms of efficiency, effectiveness and usability.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Learning of visual modules from examples
โœ Tomaso Poggio; Shimon Edelman; Manfred Fahle ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1992 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science โš– 999 KB

Networks that solve specific visual tasks, such as the evaluation of spatial relations with hyperacuity precision, can be easily synthesized from a small set of examples. The present paper describes a series of simulated psychophysical experiments that replicate human performance in hyperacuity task

A framework for understanding network in
โœ Madhav Moganti; Steven F. Knittel ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2005 ๐Ÿ› Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers ๐ŸŒ English โš– 180 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views
Learning-for-use: A framework for the de
โœ Daniel C. Edelson ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2001 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 690 KB

Meeting ambitious content and process (inquiry) standards is an important challenge for science education reform particularly because educators have traditionally seen content and process as competing priorities. However, integrating content and process together in the design of learning activities

A framework for understanding dysempower
โœ Kathleen Kane; Kathleen Montgomery ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1998 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 173 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

The concept of dysempowerment is introduced as a process whereby an individual perceives certain work events as affronts to one's dignity. This perception results in affective responses that generate attitudes and behaviors having the potential to disrupt or impair the individual's task motivation.