Lead time associated with screening for prostate cancer
✍ Scribed by Magnus Törnblom; Henry Eriksson; Stefan Franzén; Ove Gustafsson; Hans Lilja; Ulf Norming; Jonas Hugosson
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2003
- Tongue
- French
- Weight
- 138 KB
- Volume
- 108
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0020-7136
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Screening serum levels of prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) is now a major strategy for early detection of prostate cancer (PC). Quantification of the lead time thus obtained is important both for understanding the development of PC and for evaluating the advantages and disadvantages of widespread screening. In our study, 1,233 randomly selected men living in Stockholm in 1988 were invited to participate in an early detection (ED) program, in which suspicious findings provided by digital rectal examination (DRE), transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) and/or a PSA value ≥10.0 ng/mL were followed up by biopsy. The cumulative incidence (Kaplan‐Meier) of PC in the 946 participants (ED) during 12 years of follow‐up was compared to that of an age‐matched, randomly selected reference population (RP) of 657 men for whom PSA values (from frozen serum samples) could also be obtained. The PC incidence in men in the RP with PSA values ≥3.0 ng/mL reached the corresponding level for the ED group after 10.6 years (the “catch‐up” point). After 12 years of follow‐up, the estimated median lead time for men with PSA values in this interval was 4.5 years in the ED population, compared to 7.8 years in the RP. With 20 years of follow‐up, the estimated median lead time of the RP was enhanced to 10.7 years. The lead time in connection with PC was influenced by the initial PSA level (although with large variations), length of follow‐up and sensitivity of the ED procedure employed. The ED program described here was not associated with major overdetection. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
Screening for prostate cancer has shown great promise in its ability to detect prostate cancer at a curable stage; however, significant problems exist with respect to our knowledge of its impact on prostate cancer mortality. For the properly informed patient with at least a 10year life expectancy, i
## Abstract It is common belief that in families with hereditary prostate cancer (HPC), unaffected men should be screened periodically with PSA, but little is known about the effects of such screening. We studied test and tumor characteristics in unaffected 50–75‐year‐old screenees from HPC familie
## Abstract From 1992–2001, 7 countries in Europe gradually recruited men for the European Randomised Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) trial. Centres recruit different age groups and have different designs for recruiting and countries have different underlying risks for prostate cancer. Recrui
Variance estimators are derived for estimators of the average lead time and average benefit time due to screening in a randomized screening trial via influence functions. The influence functions demonstrate that these estimators are asymptotically equivalent to the mean difference, between the study
Prostate glands exposed to androgen deprivation with leuprolide -+ flutamide were evaluated for pathologic changes which might be related to therapy. Comparing pretreatment and posttreatment tissue by visual discrimination using light microscopic study revealed treatment-related alterations in the s