๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Laser physician legal responsibility for physician extender treatments

โœ Scribed by David J. Goldberg


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2005
Tongue
English
Weight
42 KB
Volume
37
Category
Article
ISSN
0196-8092

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Background and Objective: Increased demand for noninvasive cosmetic laser procedures has led to an increase in the use of physician extenders (PE). This demand has now led to a variety of medical legal concerns surrounding the use of lasers by non-physician PE. Study Design: This review looks at the evolution of the relationship between physicians and the various types of PE. The focus of the manuscript is on the variety of legal issues that may arise because of this relationship. Physicians are increasingly utilizing PE in their laser facilities leading to potential legal issues. Conclusions: An understanding of these legal issues will lead to better defensive practices by both the physician and PE.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Physician's responsibility for patients
โœ David S. Bachman ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1979 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 116 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

decrease somewhat [2]. The number of presynaptic dopamine receptors, however, drops by 20 to 25% after long-term amphetamine or apomorphine administration [2], as indicated by a significant reduction in the specific binding of 3H-apomorphine in rat striatum [2]. Since presynaptic dopamine receptors

Physician knowledge, financial incentive
โœ Roland Sturm; Kenneth B. Wells ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1998 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 134 KB

Background: Two important policy levers to affect health care delivery are financing and informational interventions. Unfortunately, these two approaches have not been considered simultaneously and little is known about how their effects compare. Aims of the Study: This paper estimates the relative