๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Laser disruption and killing of mrsa biofilms

โœ Scribed by Yosef P. Krespi; Victor Kizhner; Laura Nistico; Luanne Hall-Stoodley; Paul Stoodley


Book ID
102448053
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2009
Tongue
English
Weight
410 KB
Volume
119
Category
Article
ISSN
0023-852X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Objective: To study the efficacy of two different lasers in vitro, in disrupting biofilm and killing planktonic pathogenic bacteria.

Materials and Methods:

Biofilms of S. aureus Xen 31, a stable bioluminescent clinical MRSA construct, were grown in a 96 well microtiter plate for three days. The study included seven arms; a) control, b) ciprofloxacin (0.3 mg/L,) alone, c) SW laser alone, d) NIR laser alone e) SW laser and ciprofloxacin, f) SW and NIR lasers, g) SW, NIR lasers and ciprofloxacin. The results were evaluated with an IVIS biophotonic system (for live bacteria) and optical density (for total bacteria).

Results: With no antibiotics there was a 43% reduction in OD (P<0.05) caused by the combination of SW and NIR suggesting that biofilm had been disrupted. There was an 88% reduction (P<0.05) in live biofilm. Ciprofloxacin alone resulted in a decrease of 28% of total live cells (biofilm remaining attached and disrupted planktonic cells) and 58% of biofilm cells (both P>0.05). Ciprofloxacin in combination with SW and SW + NIR lasers caused a decrease of over 60% in total live biomass and over 80% of biofilm cells, which was significantly greater than ciprofloxacin alone (P<0.05).

Conclusions: SW and NIR

Laser combination is a powerful alternative for control or eradication of MRSA biofilms.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Laser Disruption of Biofilm
โœ Yosef P. Krespi; Paul Stoodley; Luanne Hall-Stoodley ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2008 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 845 KB