𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Laparoscopically assisted bowel surgery

✍ Scribed by J. G. Tucker; W. L. Ambroze; G. R. Orangio; T. D. Duncan; E. M. Mason; G. W. Lucas


Book ID
104655993
Publisher
Springer
Year
1995
Tongue
English
Weight
373 KB
Volume
9
Category
Article
ISSN
0930-2794

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


In order to help determine the risks and benefits, we retrospectively analyzed the results of our first 114 laparoscopically assisted bowel procedures. Procedures performed consisted of partial colectomy (85), total or subtotal abdominal colectomy (8), total proctocolectomy with J-pouch ileal reservoir (I 1), and diverting procedures (10). Forty-nine procedures were for malignancy. The rate of conversion to laparotomy was 13.2%. Oral feedings were resumed in 2.4 days (range 1-5), and bowel function returned in 3.8 days (range 2-8). The average length of stay was 4.2 days for partial colectomy and 6 days for total, subtotal, and proctocolectomy. The mean return to normal activity for all groups was 16.7 days (10.8 days for partial colectomy). There were no deaths. Major morbidity (6%) consisted of abscess (3), anastomotic leak (2), and hemorrhage (1). Mean operative costs analyzed for the initial 37 patients were higher for laparoscopic colectomies when compared to traditional colectomies; however, the mean total hospital costs were less for the laparoscopic procedures. These data suggest that the laparoscopic approach to colorectal resection is an acceptable alternative to laparotomy for a variety of disease processes, allowing patients an early return to normal activity.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Digitally assisted laparoscopic surgery
✍ D. C. Dunn πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1994 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 127 KB πŸ‘ 1 views
Laparoscopically assisted appendectomy
✍ S. ViΕ‘njiΔ‡; L. PopoviΔ‡; B. ZupančiΔ‡ πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2006 πŸ› Blackwell Publishing 🌐 German βš– 228 KB