Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and gallbladder cancer
✍ Scribed by Ralf Steinert; Gerd Nestler; Emil Sagynaliev; Jörg Müller; Hans Lippert; Marc-André Reymond
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2006
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 218 KB
- Volume
- 93
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0022-4790
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Heightened awareness of the possible presence of gallbladder cancer (GBC) and the knowledge of appropriate management are important for surgeons practising laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Long‐term effects of initial LC versus open cholecystectomy (OC) on the prognosis of patients with GBC remain undefined. Patients who are suspected to have GBC should not undergo LC, since it is advantageous to perform the en‐bloc radical surgery at the initial operation. Since preoperative diagnosis of early GBC is difficult, preventive measures, such as preventing bile spillage and bagging the gallbladder should be applied for every LC. Many port‐site recurrences (PSR) have been reported after LC, but the incidence of wound recurrence is not higher than after OC. No radical procedure is required after postoperative diagnosis of incidental pT1a GBC. It is unclear if patients with pT1b GBC require extended cholecystectomy. In pT2 GBC, patients should have radical surgery (atypical or segmental liver resection and lymphadenectomy). In advanced GBC (pT3 and pT4), radical surgery can cure only a small subset of patients, if any. Additional port‐site excision is recommended, but the effectiveness of such measure is debated. J. Surg. Oncol. 2006;93:682–689. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
Gallbladder cancer is a relatively uncommon malignancy in the United States. Its presentation is similar to that of lithic disease of the gallbladder. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become the method of choice for removing the gallbladder in most benign conditions. Occasionally, unsuspected gallbl
of bowel using a Jaques' catheter with minimal trauma to the bowel'. The advantage of this technique is that it not only holds the bowel onto the surface of the skin satisfactorily, but also allows easy placement of the stoma bag adjacent to the bowel without the interference of a skin suture. In ad