𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Lack of clinical long-term benefit with the use of a drug eluting stent compared to use of a bare metal stent in saphenous vein grafts

✍ Scribed by Giuseppe Gioia; Alberto Benassi; Raghar Mohendra; Khaza Chowdhury; Iqbal Masood; William Matthai


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2008
Tongue
English
Weight
179 KB
Volume
72
Category
Article
ISSN
1522-1946

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Background: Small randomized trials have shown short‐term improved outcome with drug‐eluting stents (DES) over bare metal stent (BMS) in saphenous vein graft (SVG) interventions by reducing in‐stent restenosis and target vessel revascularization (TVR). It is not clear, however, if these benefits are maintained long term. The aim of this study is to compare the outcome in a larger cohort of patients undergoing SVG stent implantation with DES or BMS, at 2 years. Methods: From among 250 patients who underwent SVG stenting, 225 patients with available follow‐up were selected from data bases at the three participating institutions. One‐hundred‐six patients had DES (sirolimus, paclitaxel or tacrolimus eluting stent) and 119 patients had any available BMS from April 2002 to December 2006. The primary endpoint was MACE rate, a combination of cardiac death, S‐T elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and target lesion revascularization. Secondary end points were the individual components of the primary endpoint. Follow‐up was obtained by mailed interviews or telephone calls and review of the hospital chart. Results: The DES and BMS groups had similar age (71 ± 8 years vs. 70 ± 7 years, P = 1.0), diabetes (45% vs. 36%, P = 0.3), history of MI (58% vs. 51%, P = 0.6), EF (44% vs. 47%, P = 0.2) and previous PCI (40% vs. 35%, P = 0.4). Reference vessel diameter (3.15 ± 0.5 mm vs. 3.5 ± 0.5 mm. P = 0.001) and stent size (3.3 ± 0.4 mm vs. 3.9 ± 0.5 mm, P = 0.001) were smaller in the DES group; however, the BMS were longer (24 ± 10 mm vs. 21 ± 6 mm, P = 0.05). At one year there was a trend (P = 0.1) for lower MACE rate in the DES group, but at two years there was no difference in MACE free survival between the DES and BMS groups (81 % vs. 82%, P = 0.9). The death rate was similar (6% each) with three patients having STEMI (two in the DES and one in the BMS). TVR was also similar (14% in each group). Conclusion: In patients undergoing treatment of SVG disease with a stent, the marginal benefit of DES seen at 1 year was lost at 2‐year follow‐up. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Long-term clinical outcomes of real-worl
✍ Ravi K. Ramana; Adam Ronan; Kevin Cohoon; David Homan; Jessica Sutherland; Lowel 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 105 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract Objective: To evaluate the long‐term clinical outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for saphenous vein graft (SVG) disease. Specifically, we compared clinical endpoints of patients who received sirolimus‐eluting stents (SES) versus bare‐metal stents (BMS) fo

Impact of chronic renal insufficiency on
✍ Michael S. Lee; Patrick P. Hu; Joseph Aragon; Atman Shah; Ravi Bhatia; Nathaniel 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 197 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract Objectives: To evaluate the clinical outcomes in patients with chronic renal insufficiency (CRI) who undergo saphenous vein graft (SVG) intervention with drug‐eluting stents (DES). Background: Patients with CRI have higher rates of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) after percutaneous