In the ongoing battle on wear, laboratory tests have been one tool used to evaluate and model the process of wear. A second, less commonly used tool is field wear testing. Field wear testing, while being more time-consuming, has the advantage that the materials are exposed to the actual environmenta
โฆ LIBER โฆ
Laboratory simulation of clast abrasion
โ Scribed by J. Lewin; P. A. Brewer
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2002
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 413 KB
- Volume
- 27
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0360-1269
- DOI
- 10.1002/esp.306
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
A comparison of laboratory abrasion and
โ
Joe H. Tylczak; Jeffery A. Hawk; Rick D. Wilson
๐
Article
๐
1999
๐
Elsevier Science
๐
English
โ 340 KB
Laboratory simulation of lunar craters
โ
H. Fechtig; D. E. Gault; G. Neukum; E. Schneider
๐
Article
๐
1972
๐
Springer
๐
English
โ 960 KB
Simulation of pebble abrasion on coastal
โ
Gordon E. Bigelow
๐
Article
๐
1984
๐
John Wiley and Sons
๐
English
โ 342 KB
Laboratory simulation of magnetospheric
โ
W. Horton; C. Chiu; T. Ditmire; P. Valanju; R. Presura; V.V. Ivanov; Y. Sentoku;
๐
Article
๐
2007
๐
Elsevier Science
๐
English
โ 615 KB
Laboratory simulation of geogas microbub
โ
G. Etiope; S. Lombardi
๐
Article
๐
1996
๐
Springer
โ 765 KB
Computer simulation of particle interfer
โ
A. Ghobeity; M. Papini; J.K. Spelt
๐
Article
๐
2007
๐
Elsevier Science
๐
English
โ 468 KB
Abrasive jet micro-machining (AJM) uses a high-speed stream of particles to create small-scale features in substrates through controlled erosion, often through a mask which defines the feature edges. The shape of the profile machined in the substrate depends on the particle energy distribution avail