Kuhn's Evolutionary Social Epistemology
โ Scribed by K. Brad Wray
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- Year
- 2011
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 246
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Kuhn's Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962) has been enduringly influential in philosophy of science, challenging many common presuppositions about the nature of science and the growth of scientific knowledge. However, philosophers have misunderstood Kuhn's view, treating him as a relativist or social constructionist. In this book, Brad Wray argues that Kuhn provides a useful framework for developing an epistemology of science that takes account of the constructive role that social factors play in scientific inquiry. He examines the core concepts of Structure and explains the main characteristics of both Kuhn's evolutionary epistemology and his social epistemology, relating Structure to Kuhn's developed view presented in his later writings. The discussion includes analyses of the Copernican revolution in astronomy and the plate tectonics revolution in geology. The book will be useful for scholars working in science studies, sociologists and historians of science as well as philosophers of science.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
Thomas Kuhnโs The Structure of Scientific Revolutions is one of the most important books of the twentieth century. Its influence reaches far beyond the philosophy of science, and its key terms, such as โparadigm shift,โ โnormal science,โ and โincommensurability,โ are now used in both academic and pu
<p>Bojana Mladenoviฤ offers a novel analysis of Thomas Kuhnโs central philosophical project. <i>Kuhnโs Legacy </i>demonstrates the vitality of Kuhnโs philosophical project and its importance for the study of the philosophy and history of science today.</p>
<p>This volume has its already distant or1g1n in an interยญ national conference on Evolutionary Epistemology the editors organized at the University of Ghent in November 1984. This conference aimed to follow up the endeavor started at the ERISS (Epistemologically Relevant Internalist Sociology of Sci