𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Kriging, cokriging, radial basis functions and the role of positive definiteness

✍ Scribed by Donald E. Myers


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1992
Tongue
English
Weight
830 KB
Volume
24
Category
Article
ISSN
0898-1221

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


On the Positive Definiteness of Certain
✍ Toreien Maack; ZoltΓ‘n SasvΓ‘ri πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 679 KB

For a coinmutative senugoup (S, +, \*) with involution and a function f : S 4 [O, m), the set S ( f ) of those p 2 0 such that f\* is a positive definite function on S is a closed subsemigroup of [O, 00) containing 0. For S = (Hi, +, G\* = -G) it may happen that S(f) = { kd : k E No } for some d>O,a

On the smoothness of positive definite a
✍ Holger Wendland πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 596 KB

We consider positive definite and radial functions. After giving general results concerning the smoothness of general positive definite and radial functions, we investigate the class of compactly supported, positive definite, and radial functions, where every function consists of a univariate polyno

Solution of stokes flow using an iterati
✍ D.L. Young; C.C. Tsai; T.I. Eldho; A.H.-D. Cheng πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2002 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 915 KB

This paper describes an iterative dual reciprocity boundary element method (DRBEM) baaed on the compactly-supported, positive definite radial basis function for the solution of Stokes flow problems. The method invdlves the solution of Laplace equations for vorticity, and Poisson equations for veloci

Addendum to the Paper β€žOn the Measurabil
✍ ZoltΓ‘n SasvΓ‘ri πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1987 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 116 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

Let f be a positive definite function on a locally compact abelian group G. In [3] we showed that measurability of 1 on an open neighbourhood of the zero implies measurability of f on G. As a main tool we used a result about the support of f [3, Th. I]. The aim of this note is to simplify the proof