𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Kinematics of the glenohumeral joint with bankart lesion and repair

✍ Scribed by John E. Novotny; Claude E. Nichols; Bruce D. Beynnon


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1998
Tongue
English
Weight
663 KB
Volume
16
Category
Article
ISSN
0736-0266

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


A Bankart repair is performed to reduce abnormal translations of the humeral head on the glenoid due to a Bankart lesion, a separation of the capsulolabral complex from the glenoid rim. However, this is often accompanied by a loss of rotational range of motion that may lead to decreased function and osteoarthritis. This loss of rotation, coupled to the goal of reducing humeral translations, may be a result of the amount of imbrication of the capsule during repair. To determine the effects of capsular imbrication, we investigated how two Bankart repairs (2.5 and 5.0 mm of capsular imbrication) and a Bankart lesion altered the translations and rotations of the human glenohumeral joint in vitro. Coupled moments were applied to the unconstrained humerus in abduction-adduction, in flexion-extension, and to simulate the cocked phase of throwing. Motion was measured with an electromagnetic system. There were no differences in the kinematics between the intact specimens and those with a Bankart lesion or between normal specimens and the first (2.5 mm) Bankart repair. The first repair significantly reduced external rotation for the cocked phase of throwing compared with the Bankart lesion: from 46.8 +/- 23.6 degrees to 32.4 +/- 14.2 degrees (+/-SD). The second (5.0 mm) Bankart repair produced significantly different posterior translation (-4.7 +/- 3.9 mm) of the humeral head relative to the glenoid compared with normal (5.1 +/- 4.7 mm anterior) and the first repair (6.1 +/- 8.3 mm anterior), as the humerus moved from full flexion to full extension. Differences were also found for all rotations in the cocked phase of throwing. For the second repair, the humerus extended 24.3 degrees and externally rotated 18.6 degrees less than normal and was abducted 15.4 degrees more. These results indicate that both Bankart repairs do little to affect humeral translations with unconstrained moment loading but that rotations are affected during the cocked phase of throwing, with significant losses of external and extension rotations.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


A new method of nerve repair: Repair of
✍ R. V. Gore πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1978 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 172 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

## Abstract Regeneration of the radial nerve following a new technique of nerve anastomosis in the humeral spiral groove is reported. Neurorrhaphy was performed by anastomosing a branch supplying the medial head of the triceps to the distal cut end of the radial nerve at the level of the lateral in

Understanding patellofemoral pain with m
✍ Frances T. Sheehan; Aditya Derasari; Timothy J. Brindle; Katharine E. Alter πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 393 KB

## Abstract Patellofemoral pain is widely accepted as one of the most common pathologies involving the knee, yet the etiology of this pain is still an open debate. Generalized joint laxity has been associated with patellofemoral pain, but is not often discussed as a potential source of patellar mal

Using real-time MRI to quantify altered
✍ Christine E. Draper; Thor F. Besier; Juan M. Santos; Fabio Jennings; Michael Fre πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 218 KB

## Abstract Abnormal patellofemoral joint motion is a possible cause of patellofemoral pain, and patellar braces are thought to alleviate pain by restoring normal joint kinematics. We evaluated whether females with patellofemoral pain exhibit abnormal patellofemoral joint kinematics during dynamic,

Changes in lower limb kinematics, kineti
✍ Eamonn Delahunt; Kenneth Monaghan; Brian Caulfield πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2006 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 293 KB

## Abstract The purpose of this study was to identify differences in 3D kinematics, kinetics, and ankle joint muscle activity in subjects with functional instability (FI) of the ankle joint during a drop jump. Twenty‐four subjects with the subjective complaint of FI of the ankle joint and 24 noninj