This book focuses on the important work of Karl Mannheim by demonstrating how his theoretical conception of a reflexive sociology took shape as a collaborative empirical research programme. The authors show how contemporary work along these lines can benefit from the insights of Mannheim and his stu
Karl Mannheim and the Legacy of Max Weber
β Scribed by David Kettler, Colin Loader, Volker Meja
- Publisher
- Ashgate
- Year
- 2008
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 229
- Series
- Rethinking Classical Sociology
- Edition
- 1st
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
This book focuses on the important work of Karl Mannheim by demonstrating how his theoretical conception of a reflexive sociology took shape as a collaborative empirical research program. The authors show how contemporary work along these lines, whether derived from Foucault, Bourdieu or other theorists, can benefit from the insights of Mannheim and his students into both morphology and genealogy.Inspired by recent receptions of Karl Mannheim that do not restrict themselves to familiar arguments about the sociology of knowledge, the book contains three themes. First it offers a new reading of Mannheim's 'empirical' project, with emphasis on his lifelong dialogue with Max Weber. Special attention is paid to his article on 'economic ambition.' Second, the book analyzes the work arising out of Mannheim's Frankfurt research group, notably the early writings of Norbert Elias, Hans Speier, and Hans Gerth, as well as dissertations by Mannheim's students, including studies of newspapers, women's household roles, sentimentalism in women's literature, relations between female social workers and male bureaucrats, exile, Jewish assimilation, and Liberal 'cultivation.' Finally, the book contributes to the microsociology of knowledge, uncovering the modalities that made for an open working group in Frankfurt that was expressly not a school.The book returns Mannheim's sociology of knowledge inquiries into the broader context of a wider project in historical and cultural sociology, whose promising development was disrupted and then partially obscured by the expulsion of Mannheim's intellectual generation. It is about Karl Mannheim as he served his most productive - and independent - students and not as he has been stereotyped in the literature. As such, it will appeal to sociologists concerned with the contemporary relevance of his work, and who are prepared for a fresh look at Weimar sociology and the legacy of Max Weber.
β¦ Table of Contents
Contents......Page 6
Series Editorβs Preface......Page 8
Preface......Page 12
List of Abbreviations......Page 14
About the Authors......Page 16
Introduction......Page 18
1 The Challenging Context......Page 26
2 Time and Place......Page 40
3 The Social Structure of Advancement: Education for Life in the Economy......Page 50
4 The βIntensive Study Groupβ Around Karl Mannheim......Page 74
5 Norbert Elias and the Sociology of External Forms......Page 92
6 Hans Gerth and Hans Weil: The Genealogy of the Liberal Bildungselite......Page 102
7 KΓ€the Truhel and the Idea of a Social Bureaucracy......Page 118
8 Natalie Halperin and Margarete Freudenthal: The Genealogy of Womenβs Movements......Page 134
9 Jacob Katz: Sociology of the Stranger I......Page 148
10 Nina Rubinstein: Sociology of the Stranger II......Page 158
11 Individual Projects and Orphans......Page 170
12 The Unfinished Business Between Karl Mannheim and Max Weber......Page 204
Bibliography......Page 214
E......Page 224
J......Page 225
M......Page 226
R......Page 227
W......Page 228
Y......Page 229
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Lowith's 1932 essay on Marx and Weber remains the definitive statement of the deep commonalities between these two thinkers. That is, it argues that Weber's central concern is to develop a fundamental theory of capitalism, as with Marx. For decades, it was "necessary" to attempt to parry Marx with
This is a key text in modern interpretations of alienation in Marxist theory and rationalization in Weber's sociology. It remains the best student introduction to the differences and comparisons between these two essential thinkers.