Justice through consensus: Shared identity and the preference for a restorative notion of justice
✍ Scribed by Michael Wenzel; Tyler G. Okimoto; Norman T. Feather; Michael J. Platow
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2009
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 234 KB
- Volume
- 40
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0046-2772
- DOI
- 10.1002/ejsp.657
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
We propose a concept of restorative justice as a sense of justice deriving from consensus about, and the reaffirmation of, values violated by an offence (in contrast to punishment‐based retributive justice). Victims should be more likely to seek restorative justice (and less likely retributive justice) when they perceive to share a relevant identity with the offender. In Study 1, when the relevant identity (university affiliation) shared with the offender was made salient (vs. not), participants found a consensus‐based response more justice‐restoring. In Study 2, when the group (company) shared with the offender was cohesive (vs. not), participants more strongly endorsed a restorative justice philosophy and, mediated by this, responded in consensus‐restoring ways. In Study 3, when the offender was an ingroup (vs. outgroup) member, participants more strongly endorsed a restorative justice philosophy, fully mediated by sadness emotions. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES