๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Juror decisions about damages in employment discrimination cases

โœ Scribed by Edith Greene; Cheryl Downey; Jane Goodman-Delahunty


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1999
Tongue
English
Weight
138 KB
Volume
17
Category
Article
ISSN
0735-3936

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


This article examines inยฏuences on mock juror and jury decision making regarding damages in an employment discrimination case. We examined the eects of expert economic testimony, suggested awards, and conยฏicting economic testimony on decisions regarding lost wages and beneยฎts and pain and suering. Participants heard excerpts of an age discrimination lawsuit in which liability had previously been determined in the plainti's favor. We varied whether suggested awards were included and if so, whether they were presented by attorneys, a plainti's expert economist,


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


U.S. Supreme court rules on punitive dam
โœ Arthur F. Silbergeld; Tracy L. Turner ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2000 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 49 KB

A wards of punitive damages have been allowed since the 1991 Civil Rights Act amended Title VII, and they are the worst fear of employers facing unlawful discrimination or harassment litigation. From the perspective of the plaintiff and his or her attorney, such damages are the bread and butter of a

Damage awards and jurors' responsibility
โœ Neil Vidmar; Jessica Lee; Elaina Cohen; Anne Stewart ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1994 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 800 KB

Many critics of the tort system have accused juries of assessing larger awards against defendants perceived to have the ability to pay. Juries are said to be particularly prone to go after the 'deep pockets' of doctors in medical malpractice cases as compared to defendants found negligent in automob