Juror decisions about damages in employment discrimination cases
โ Scribed by Edith Greene; Cheryl Downey; Jane Goodman-Delahunty
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1999
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 138 KB
- Volume
- 17
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0735-3936
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
This article examines inยฏuences on mock juror and jury decision making regarding damages in an employment discrimination case. We examined the eects of expert economic testimony, suggested awards, and conยฏicting economic testimony on decisions regarding lost wages and beneยฎts and pain and suering. Participants heard excerpts of an age discrimination lawsuit in which liability had previously been determined in the plainti's favor. We varied whether suggested awards were included and if so, whether they were presented by attorneys, a plainti's expert economist,
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract Employment decisions like selection, promotion, and termination should be analyzed to prevent litigation or to refute a prima facie case.
A wards of punitive damages have been allowed since the 1991 Civil Rights Act amended Title VII, and they are the worst fear of employers facing unlawful discrimination or harassment litigation. From the perspective of the plaintiff and his or her attorney, such damages are the bread and butter of a
Many critics of the tort system have accused juries of assessing larger awards against defendants perceived to have the ability to pay. Juries are said to be particularly prone to go after the 'deep pockets' of doctors in medical malpractice cases as compared to defendants found negligent in automob