✦ LIBER ✦

Junior scientists are sceptical of sceptics of open access: a reply to Agrawal

✍ Scribed by Carter, Alecia J.; Horrocks, Nicholas P.C.; Huchard, Elise; Logan, Corina J.; Lukas, Dieter; MacLeod, Kirsty J.; Marshall, Harry H.; Peck, Hannah L.; Sanderson, Jennifer L.; Sorensen, Marjorie C.

Book ID: 122109408
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 2014
Tongue: English
Weight: 123 KB
Volume: 19
Category: Article
ISSN: 1360-1385
DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2014.04.005

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

In Defense of a Sceptical Rationalism: A

In Defense of a Sceptical Rationalism: A Reply to Seyla Benhabib

✍ Benjamin Gregg 📂 Article 📅 1987 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 137 KB

Of public interest groups and sceptics:

Of public interest groups and sceptics: a realist's reply to Professor Stanbury

✍ Susan D. Phillips 📂 Article 📅 1993 🏛 Wiley (Blackwell Publishing) 🌐 French ⚖ 731 KB

A reply to ‘Scepticism about the virtue

A reply to ‘Scepticism about the virtue ethics approach to nursing ethics’ by Stephen Holland: the relevance of virtue in nursing ethics

✍ Daniel A. Putman 📂 Article 📅 2012 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 56 KB

Four more reasons to be skeptical of ope

Four more reasons to be skeptical of open-access publishing

✍ Agrawal, Anurag A. 📂 Article 📅 2014 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 151 KB

A Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter, 4

A Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter, 4-Week Study to Evaluate the Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of ITCA 650 in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes☆☆This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works License, which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

✍ Henry, Robert R.; Logan, Douglas; Alessi, Thomas; Baron, Michelle A. 📂 Article 📅 2013 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 760 KB