✦ LIBER ✦

Judging the accuracy of a likelihood judgment: the case of smoking risk

✍ Scribed by Paul D. Windschitl

Book ID: 101702736
Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 2002
Tongue: English
Weight: 129 KB
Volume: 15
Category: Article
ISSN: 0894-3257
DOI: 10.1002/bdm.401

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Effects of a Relative-Frequency Elicitat

Effects of a Relative-Frequency Elicitation Question on Likelihood Judgment Accuracy: The Case of External Correspondence

✍ Paul C. Price 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 203 KB

The Good Judge Revisited: Individual Dif

The Good Judge Revisited: Individual Differences in the Accuracy of Personality Judgments

✍ Christiansen, Neil D.; Wolcott-Burnam, Shaina; Janovics, Jay E.; Burns, Gary N.; 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 Taylor and Francis Group 🌐 English ⚖ 203 KB

Judging the judges through accuracy-impl

Judging the judges through accuracy-implication metrics: The case of inventory forecasting

✍ Aris A. Syntetos; Konstantinos Nikolopoulos; John E. Boylan 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 1004 KB

Professional vs. amateur judgment accura

Professional vs. amateur judgment accuracy: The case of foreign exchange rates

✍ Dilek Önkal; J.Frank Yates; Can Simga-Mugan; Şule Öztin 📂 Article 📅 2003 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 332 KB

The Accuracy of Design-based Judgments:

The Accuracy of Design-based Judgments: A Constructivist Approach

✍ Orth, Ulrich R.; Malkewitz, Keven 📂 Article 📅 2012 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 409 KB

Contingent approaches to making likeliho

Contingent approaches to making likelihood judgments about polychotomous cases: the influence of task factors

✍ Paul D. Windschitl; Zlatan Krizan 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 277 KB

## Abstract Two experiments tested the influence of three task factors on respondents' tendency to use normative, heuristic, and random approaches to making likelihood judgments about polychotomous cases (i.e., cases in which there is more than one alternative to a focal hypothesis). Participants e