๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Judgemental revision of sales forecasts: The relative performance of judgementally revised versus non-revised forecasts

โœ Scribed by Brian P. Mathews; Adamantios Diamantopoulos


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1992
Tongue
English
Weight
441 KB
Volume
11
Category
Article
ISSN
0277-6693

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


The judgemental revision of sales forecasts is an issue which is receiving increasing attention in the forecasting literature. This paper compares the performance of forecasts after revision by managers with that of the forecasts which were accepted by them wifhout revision. The data set consists of sales forecasting data from an industrial company, spanning six quarterly periods and relating t o some 900 individual products. The findings show that, in general, the improvements made by managers bring the forecast errors of revised forecasts more into line with non-revised forecasts, but the change is often marginal, and the best result is equivalence between revised and non-revised forecasts.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Judgemental revision of sales forecasts:
โœ Brian P. Mathews; A. Diamantopoulous ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1990 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 534 KB

When managers make revisions to sales forecasts initially generated by a rational quantitative model it is important that the particular forecasts selected for adjustment are those which would benefit most from the adjustment process (i.e. realize high errors). This study reports an empirical invest

Judgemental revision of sales forecasts:
โœ Brian P. Mathews; A. Diamantopoulos ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1989 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 768 KB

When quantitative models are used for short-term multi-item sales forecasts it is possible that the managers who use such forecasts may disagree with at least some of the estimates obtained, and wish to change them so that they become more consistent with their own (subjective) evaluation of the mar