When managers make revisions to sales forecasts initially generated by a rational quantitative model it is important that the particular forecasts selected for adjustment are those which would benefit most from the adjustment process (i.e. realize high errors). This study reports an empirical invest
Judgemental revision of sales forecasts: The relative performance of judgementally revised versus non-revised forecasts
โ Scribed by Brian P. Mathews; Adamantios Diamantopoulos
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1992
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 441 KB
- Volume
- 11
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0277-6693
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
The judgemental revision of sales forecasts is an issue which is receiving increasing attention in the forecasting literature. This paper compares the performance of forecasts after revision by managers with that of the forecasts which were accepted by them wifhout revision. The data set consists of sales forecasting data from an industrial company, spanning six quarterly periods and relating t o some 900 individual products. The findings show that, in general, the improvements made by managers bring the forecast errors of revised forecasts more into line with non-revised forecasts, but the change is often marginal, and the best result is equivalence between revised and non-revised forecasts.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
When quantitative models are used for short-term multi-item sales forecasts it is possible that the managers who use such forecasts may disagree with at least some of the estimates obtained, and wish to change them so that they become more consistent with their own (subjective) evaluation of the mar