𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Joint testing of genotype and ancestry association in admixed families

✍ Scribed by Hua Tang; David O. Siegmund; Nicholas A. Johnson; Isabelle Romieu; Stephanie J. London


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2010
Tongue
English
Weight
294 KB
Volume
34
Category
Article
ISSN
0741-0395

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Current genome‐wide association studies (GWAS) often involve populations that have experienced recent genetic admixture. Genotype data generated from these studies can be used to test for association directly, as in a non‐admixed population. As an alternative, these data can be used to infer chromosomal ancestry, and thus allow for admixture mapping. We quantify the contribution of allele‐based and ancestry‐based association testing under a family‐design, and demonstrate that the two tests can provide non‐redundant information. We propose a joint testing procedure, which efficiently integrates the two sources information. The efficiencies of the allele, ancestry and combined tests are compared in the context of a GWAS. We discuss the impact of population history and provide guidelines for future design and analysis of GWAS in admixed populations. Genet. Epidemiol. 34:783‐791, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Comparison of admixture and association
✍ Geraldine Clarke; Alice S. Whittemore 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 254 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract The family‐based admixture mapping test (AMT) identifies disease‐related genes using family data from admixed individuals with the disease of interest (cases). The cases' genotypes at a set of markers are used to infer their DNA ancestry as it varies in blocks along the chromosomes. The

Interpretation of simultaneous linkage a
✍ Ren-Hua Chung; Elizabeth R. Hauser; Eden R. Martin 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 138 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract Linkage and association analyses have played important roles in identifying susceptibility genes for complex diseases. Linkage tests and family‐based tests of association are often applied in the same data to help fine‐map disease loci or validate results. This paradigm increases effici

Validity and power of association testin
✍ Stacey Knight; Nicola J. Camp 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 109 KB 👁 1 views

Current common wisdom posits that association analyses using family-based designs have inflated type 1 error rates (if relationships are ignored) and independent controls are more powerful than familial controls. We explore these suppositions. We show theoretically that family-based designs can have

Association analyses of MAOA in Chinese
✍ Lu Liu; Li-Li Guan; Yun Chen; Ning Ji; Hai-Mei Li; Ze-Hua Li; Qiu-Jin Qian; Li Y 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 207 KB 👁 3 views

## Abstract Monoamine oxidase A (MAOA) plays a critical role in the metabolism of monoamine neurotransmitters including serotonin (5‐HT), norepinephrine (NE), and dopamine (DA). Genetic studies have found an association between __MAOA__ and attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), especiall

On a general class of conditional tests
✍ Christoph Lange; Nan M. Laird 📂 Article 📅 2002 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 208 KB 👁 2 views

## Abstract Family‐based association tests (FBATs) provide simple and powerful tests to detect association between a genetic marker and a disease‐susceptibility locus, manifest in subjects by a phenotype or disease trait. Here we propose a new class of conditional tests for family‐based association