Issues for cross-cultural psychiatric research in South Africa
โ Scribed by Leslie Swartz
- Publisher
- Springer US
- Year
- 1985
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 880 KB
- Volume
- 9
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0165-005X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
South Africa's heterogenous society offers many opportunities for cross-cultural psychiatric research, but researchers in the country are subject to a number of restraints. Apart from legally enforced segregation, there are strict censorship laws and restricted access to certain types of information. The issues surrounding categorization of cultures and factors affecting publishing research from South Africa have important implications for the type of work that is done. It is a central argument of this article that the issues affecting research in South Africa are relevant to other countries as well, and parallels between the local and international context are drawn. The South African experience suggests that analysis of the research enterprise itself is a useful part of the business of cross-cultural psychiatric research.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
In this article, the need for effective crossโcultural counseling in South Africa is emphasized against the background of the country's sociocultural context. The characteristics of personโcentered counseling that make it crossโculturally suitable in the South African situation are discussed. Rogers
## Abstract This paper describes the development, translation and adaptation of measures in the National Latino and Asian American Study (NLAAS). We summarize the techniques used to attain cultural relevance; semantic, content and technical equivalency; and internal consistency of the measures acro
## Abstract Major differences exist between the environment in which research is carried out and farming is practised. The challenge for research is to develop an agenda and design projects that address realโlife problems. On a national and regional level, key issues for research include increased
When chiding others for discrepancies between reach and grasp, it is well to pay special heed to the measures of claim and evidence in one's own argument. Alex Cohen's challenge to over a quarter-century of received orthodoxy is a serious and consequential one. If, upon close scrutiny, it too can be