✦ LIBER ✦

Isomorphic Burnside rings

✍ Scribed by Satya Deo; K Varadarajan

Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 1991
Tongue: English
Weight: 822 KB
Volume: 139
Category: Article
ISSN: 0021-8693
DOI: 10.1016/0021-8693(91)90304-q

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Picard Groups, Grothendieck Rings, and B

Picard Groups, Grothendieck Rings, and Burnside Rings of Categories

✍ J.P. May 📂 Article 📅 2001 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 138 KB

for spurring me to write these observations, and I thank Halvard Fausk and Gaunce Lewis for careful readings of several drafts and many helpful comments. I thank Madhav Nori and Hyman Bass for help with the ring theory examples and Peter Freyd, Michael Boardman, and Neil Strickland for facts about c

Crossed Burnside Rings I. The Fundamenta

Crossed Burnside Rings I. The Fundamental Theorem

✍ Fumihito Oda; Tomoyuki Yoshida 📂 Article 📅 2001 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 283 KB

Let G be a finite group and S a finite G-monoid. A crossed G-set over S is a finite G-set equipped with a G-map into S called a weight function. A crossed Ž . Burnside ring X ⍀ G, S is the Grothendieck ring of the category of crossed G-sets with respect to disjoint unions and tensor products. In thi

A note on isomorphic chordal rings

✍ Amiya Nayak; Vincenzo Accia; Paolo Gissi 📂 Article 📅 1995 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 275 KB

Isomorphic group rings over domains revi

Isomorphic group rings over domains revisited

✍ M.M Parmenter; E Spiegel 📂 Article 📅 1990 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 351 KB

The burnside ring modulo a prime

✍ Eliot Jacobson 📂 Article 📅 1986 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 706 KB

Class Group Relations from Burnside Ring

Class Group Relations from Burnside Ring Idempotents

✍ Robert Boltje 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 337 KB

We show that for each finite cohomological Mackey functor on a finite group G there exist explicit relations in the category of finite abelian groups between the evaluations of the Mackey functor at all the subgroups, one for each conjugacy class of nonhypo-elementary subgroups of G. Furthermore, we