The currently accepted universal tree of life based on molecular phylogenies is characterised by a prokaryotic root and the sisterhood of archaea and eukaryotes. The recent discovery that each domain (bacteria, archaea, and eucarya) represents a mosaic of the two others in terms of its gene content
Is something wrong with the tree of life?
β Scribed by William F. Martin
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1996
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 741 KB
- Volume
- 18
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0265-9247
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
A recent study^(1)^ of sequence data from many different proteins has suggested that contemporary prokaryotes and eukaryotes may have shared a common ancestor as recently as 2 billion years ago (the molecular clock). Strong evidence from the geological record, however, indicates that oxygenβproducing microorganisms, perhaps similar to modern cyanobacteria, existed 3.5 billion years ago. The fossil evidence, therefore, suggests that any common ancestor of prokaryotes and eukaryotes must have existed at least 1.5 billion years earlier than suggested by the molecular clock evidence. The discrepancy between molecular and geological evidence for the age of modern cells is considered here, as are aspects of gene descent in the tree of life that might help to account for it.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Kindle Edition, 215 pages Published June 30th 2010 The final battle for Earth draws near. The giants have gathered otherworldly weapons to defeat the guardian Cherub before the Tree of Life. If they win, they will rule the world as gods. Lord Uriah marches with a hardy band of warriors to
Dr. Nicklaus Hart has lost his moral compass. As an orthopedic surgeon in a busy trauma practice, the cares of the world overshadow what Nick knows is true about himself. With his life unraveling, he falls into his old patterns of stress relief but knows they are a poisonous cure. Nick is shak
## Abstract Here, architectural and scientific researcher **Rachel Armstrong** questions whether the definition of βexperimentalβ green design presented here goes far enough. She urges architects to not dwell on evaluation processes, performance and βstrategiesβ and to seek a far more radical solut