Is serum uric acid a predictive factor of response to IFN-treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis C infection?
✍ Scribed by Rinaldo Pellicano; Giovanni Puglisi; Alessia Ciancio; Federico Balzola; Giorgio Saracco; Giovannino Ciccone; Ileana Baldi; Maria Lorena Abate; Antonina Smedile; Mario Rizzetto
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2008
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 87 KB
- Volume
- 80
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0146-6615
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Several factors, including metabolic profile, are predictive of response to standard antiviral therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C. In a retrospective study, it was investigated whether uric acid, involved in metabolic syndrome, could be included. A total of 153 patients (56.2% males; mean age 45.7 ± 11.3 years) treated with pegylated‐interferon and ribavirin were included. Eighty‐five were infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 or 4 and 68 with genotype 2 or 3. Viral load was >1,000,000 IU/ml in 101, ≤1,000,000 IU/ml in 35 and unknown in 17 patients. Ishak fibrosis score was ≤4 in 81, >4 in 15 and unknown in 57 patients. Mean serum uric acid was 5.05 ± 1.3 mg/dl. Sustained virological response (negative serum HCV‐RNA 6 months after treatment cessation) was achieved in 102 patients (67%). In the final logistic model, serum uric acid level ≥5.8 mg/dl (OR = 0.46; 95% CI: 0.30–0.62), viral load (OR = 0.29; 95% CI: 0.09–0.92) and HCV genotype (OR = 0.23; 95% CI: 0.09–0.60) were identified as the most important factors independently influencing clinical outcome. The prognostic role of serum uric acid was confirmed on the sub‐sample reporting Ishak fibrosis score (OR = 0.49; 95% CI: 0.28–0.85). Serum uric acid level ≥5.8 mg/dl is predictive of poor response to HCV treatment. Prospective studies are needed to clarify the issue. J. Med. Virol. 80:628–631, 2008. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract In order to understand better the clinical significance and prognostic value of antibody responses to HCV proteins and in search for parameters that may allow the early identification of non‐sustained responders to therapy, antibody levels were measured against NS3, NS4a and NS5a at bas
## Abstract Serum hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA level has been shown to be a good predictor of subsequent response to interferon‐α (IFN) therapy in US patients in whom genotype 1a/1b are both predominant. To determine whether serum HCV RNA level is a predictor of subsequent response to IFN in Japanes
We read with great interest the article published in a recent issue of HEPATOLOGY. 1 Shirakawa et al. enrolled 120 patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) infected with genotype 1 hepatitis C virus (HCV-1) and high baseline viral loads (HVL), defined by HCV RNA levels Ն 10 5 international units (IU)
Interferon (IFN) alfa has been used widely for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections but only a small number of patients treated have shown a sustained biochemical and virological response. Anti-envelope E1 and E2 antibody titers were assessed retrospectively before, during, an
## Abstract The interferon sensitivity‐determining region (ISDR) is useful as a predictive marker of the response to interferon (IFN) therapy for chronic hepatitis patients with a Japan‐specific subtype (J‐type) of hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1b. This marker is not useful for predicting respon