✦ LIBER ✦

Is Hare's Prescriptivism Morally Neutral?

✍ Scribed by William Lyons

Book ID: 124716080
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
Year: 1972
Tongue: English
Weight: 116 KB
Volume: 82
Category: Article
ISSN: 0014-1704
DOI: 10.2307/2380204

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

IS METAETHICS MORALLY NEUTRAL?

✍ JEREMY FANTL 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 105 KB

PRESCRIPTIVISM IN THEORY AND IN PRACTICE

PRESCRIPTIVISM IN THEORY AND IN PRACTICE: THE MORAL PHILOSOPHY OF R. M. HARE

✍ GERARD J. HUGHES 📂 Article 📅 1973 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 704 KB

Universalized prescriptivism and utilita

Universalized prescriptivism and utilitarianism: Hare's attempted forced marriage

✍ H. J. McCloskey 📂 Article 📅 1979 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 987 KB

Hare's Account of Moral Reasoning

✍ David S. Scarrow 📂 Article 📅 1966 🏛 University of Chicago Press 🌐 English ⚖ 167 KB

Fanaticism and Hare's Moral Theory

✍ Robert K. Fullinwider 📂 Article 📅 1977 🏛 University of Chicago Press 🌐 English ⚖ 215 KB

Some flaws in Hare's moral theory

✍ Reginald C. Perry 📂 Article 📅 1987 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 324 KB

Professor Hare maintains that the principal function of moral judgments is to furnish a guide to choices and conduct, and that to perform this function they must be interpreted, not as indicatives, whose function is said to be merely that of stating what is taken to be the case, but as imperatives,