𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Is chloromethyl-X-Rosamine useful in measuring mitochondrial transmembrane potential?

✍ Scribed by Cristiano Ferlini; Giovanni Scambia; Andrea Fattorossi


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1998
Tongue
English
Weight
16 KB
Volume
31
Category
Article
ISSN
0196-4763

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


The paper from Macho et al. (3) describes the suitability of chloromethyl-X-rosamine (CMXRos) as an aldehydefixable potential-sensitive fluorochrome to be used for the detection of mitochondrial transmembrane potential (⌬⌿ m ) changes during early apoptosis. In our opinion, the data presented in the paper do not fully support the interpretation that a straightforward correlation between CMXRos binding and ⌬⌿ m exists. In that Figure 1, double-staining analysis indicates that 30 nM of CMXRos parallel DiOC 6generated fluorescence. Treatment with mCICCP, an uncoupling agent that dissipates ⌬⌿ m , induces a reduction of CMXRos (and DiOC6) signal of more than 2 logs (from near 400 to near 2 channels of fluorescence). These data do not match those obtained in the single-color experiments described in Figure 3A, showing that the highest achievable fluorescence signal with 30 nM CMXRos is near channel 20, and that it is reduced to near channel 1 upon mCiCCP treatment. Thus, there is more than 1 log difference in the fluorescence signal generated by the same amount of CMXRos, depending on whether the latter is used alone or in combination with DiOC 6 . Such behavior suggests a spillover of the DiOC 6 ''green'' signal into the ''red'' channel in which the fluorescence of CMXRos is collected. In this light, much of the CMXRos fluorescence measured in double-color experiments would actually reflect DiOC 6 fluorescence and underlies the straight correlation seen between the two fluorochromes: dissipating ⌬⌿ m will reduce DiOC 6 -generated fluorescence, thereby rendering it no longer strong enough to produce the ''red'' signal.

The possibility that CMXRos fluorescence may not completely depend on ⌬⌿ m is also supported by the


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Authors' response: Chloromethyl-X-Rosami
✍ Antonio Macho; Didier Decaudin; Maria Castedo; Tamara Hirsch; Santos A. Susin; N πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1998 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 17 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

Chloromethyl-X-rosamine (CMXRos) has been used successfully, alone or in combination with other FITC-labeled probes, to detect a disruption in the mitochondrial transmembrane potential (⌬⌿m) occurring in apoptosis. This probe has been used to demonstrate that, during programmed cell death, the ⌬⌿m b

Detection of apoptosis and changes in mi
✍ Martin Poot; Robert C. Pierce πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 39 KB

## CHLOROMETHYL-X-ROSAMINE In a recent issue of Cytometry, the interpretation of flow cytometric data obtained after chloromethyl-X-rosamine (CMXRos) staining of apoptotic cells became the subject of a debate (1,3). Ferlini et al. (1) analyzed data in an article by Macho et al. in Cytometry (2) and

The use of chloromethyl-X-rosamine (Mito
✍ Kerry Gilmore; Mark Wilson πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 82 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

Background: A recent report by Macho et al. (Cytometry 25: 333-340, 1996) described the use of chloromethyl-Xrosamine (CMX-Ros) as a fixable probe for detection of loss of mitochondrial membrane potential ( mit ), an early event in many models of apoptosis. However, this previous report lacked a des