Let Ξ³(G) and ir(G) denote the domination number and the irredundance number of a graph G, respectively. Allan and Laskar [Proc. 9th Southeast Conf. on Combin., Graph Theory & Comp. (1978) 43-56] and BollobΓ‘s and Cock- ayne [J. Graph Theory (1979) 241-249] proved independently that Ξ³(G) < 2ir(G) for
Irredundance number versus domination number
β Scribed by Peter Damaschke
- Book ID
- 103058298
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1991
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 243 KB
- Volume
- 89
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0012-365X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Damaschke, P., Irredundance number versus domination number, Discrete Mathematics 89 (1991) 101-104. The domination number y(G) and the irredundance number ir(G) of a graph G have been considered by many authors from a graph-theoretic or from an algorithmic point of view. In this graph-theoretic paper the infimum of all quotients ir(G)/y(G) is investigated.
It is well known that ir(G) s y(G) holds for all undirected graphs G. We show that f is the infimum of all quotients ir(T)/y(T) in which T is a tree. Furthermore, there is no tree that attains the infimum. An analogous result for graphs is already known.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES