Irinotecan hydrochloride for the treatment of recurrent and refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma : A single institution experience

✍ Scribed by Katsuki Sugiyama; Ken Omachi; Keiichi Fujiwara; Takashi Saotome; Nobuyuki Mizunuma; Shunji Takahashi; Yoshinori Ito; Keisuke Aiba; Noboru Horikoshi

• Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
• Year: 2002
• Tongue: English
• Weight: 85 KB
• Volume: 94
• Category: Article
• ISSN: 0008-543X
• DOI: 10.1002/cncr.10266

✦ Synopsis

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT‐11) has a broad range of antitumor activity and has demonstrated little cross‐resistance with doxorubicin or vincristine. In the current study, the authors investigated the efficacy and adverse effects of irinotecan in the treatment of recurrent and refractory non‐Hodgkin lymphoma, for which current therapies appear to be unsatisfactory.

METHODS

Irinotecan was administered by intravenous infusion at a dose of 40 mg/m^2^/day for 3 days, and this regimen was repeated 2–3 times at weekly intervals, followed by 2 weeks off therapy. The subjects were 48 patients with recurrent or refractory non‐Hodgkin lymphoma. The histologic classification (Working Formulation) was low grade in 8 patients, intermediate grade in 36 patients, high grade in 1 patient, and other (angiocentric lymphoma, Ki‐1 lymphoma, and unidentified) in 3 patients.

RESULTS

Forty‐five patients were determined to be evaluable. Therapy resulted in a complete disease remission in 2 patients and a partial remission in 15 patients. The response rate was 37.8%. The median duration of response was 64 days and the median time to disease progression was 77 days. The median survival time was 422 days. Major adverse reactions included myelosuppression and gastrointestinal toxicity. Leukopenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia of Grade 3 or 4 (according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria) was observed in 63.0%, 30.4%, and 6.5% of the patients, respectively, and Grade 3 or 4 diarrhea occurred in 30.4% of patients. Treatment was withdrawn because of diarrhea in three patients. Because of myelosuppression and diarrhea, approximately 67% of the patients required changes to the regimen, including dose reduction, prolongation of the interval between treatments, and reducing the number of days of consecutive treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the current study suggest the activity of irinotecan as salvage therapy for patients with recurrent and refractory non‐Hodgkin lymphoma. However, the optimum dosing schedule remains to be determined. Cancer 2002;94:594–600. © 2002 American Cancer Society.

DOI 10.1002/cncr.10266