✦ LIBER ✦

Inviting witnesses to speculate: Effects of age and interaction on children’s recall

✍ Scribed by Nadja Schreiber; Janat F. Parker

Book ID: 116636414
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 2004
Tongue: English
Weight: 530 KB
Volume: 89
Category: Article
ISSN: 0022-0965
DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2004.03.008

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Child and adult witnesses: the effect of

Child and adult witnesses: the effect of repetition and invitation-probes on free recall and metamemory realism

✍ Jens Knutsson; Carl Martin Allwood; Marcus Johansson 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 Springer US 🌐 English ⚖ 189 KB

Do children need to learn to collaborate

Do children need to learn to collaborate?: The effect of age and age differences on collaborative recall

✍ Patrick J. Leman; Zoë Oldham 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 157 KB

Effects of test expectancy (recall vs. r

Effects of test expectancy (recall vs. recognition) on children’s recall and recognition

✍ Hall, James W.; Miskiewicz, Rosemarie; Gaymurray, Cheryl 📂 Article 📅 1977 🏛 Springer - Psychonomic Society ⚖ 828 KB

Inconsistencies in children's recall of

Inconsistencies in children's recall of witnessed events: The role of age, question format and perceived reason for question repetition

✍ Pauline Howie; Nadezhda Kurukulasuriya; Laura Nash; Annabel Marsh 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 215 KB

Effect of stimulus presentation modes on

Effect of stimulus presentation modes on children’s recall and clustering

✍ Horowitz, Alan B. 📂 Article 📅 1969 🏛 Springer - Psychonomic Society ⚖ 374 KB

Depressive effects of underlining and ad

Depressive effects of underlining and adjunct questions on children's recall of text

✍ John P. Rickards; Peter R. Denner 📂 Article 📅 1979 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 659 KB

Half of a sample of ten-year-old school children (N = 69) were given conceptual postquestions after every paragraph of text, while the other half were not given any postquestions. Additionally, these children either generated their own underlining of one sentence per paragraph, received text with to