A recently completed review by the Editor suggests that many of the submissions to The Journal of Futures Markets are on narrow topics which neither reflect the breadth of interests of the readers of the Journal nor address the most important problems facing the futures and derivatives industry. Per
Invited reaction: Comments on feature article
โ Scribed by Timothy T. Baldwin
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1996
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 278 KB
- Volume
- 7
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1044-8004
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
I am pleased to have the opportunity to respond to the article by Yorks, O'Neil, Marsick, Nilson, and Kolodny, "Boundary Management in Action Reflection Leaming-Research: Taking the Role of a Sophisticated Barbarian." The authors present a rich case study that highlights the tensions of trying to conduct research within the context of action learning. Given the explosion of action learning interventions in organizations today, I think it is critical that human resource development (HRD) researchers attend to such interventions. The article is therefore timely. In this response, I echo the authors' sentiments regarding both the importance of critical reflection to successful action leaming and the delicate task of managing boundaries as a participant-observer.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
A recently completed review by the Editor suggests that many of the submissions to The Journal of Futures Markets are on narrow topics which neither reflect the breadth of interests of the readers of the Journal nor address the most important problems facing the futures and derivatives industry. Per
A recently completed review by the Editor suggests that many of the submissions to The Journal of Futures Markets are on narrow topics which neither reflect the breadth of interests of the readers of the Journal nor address the most important problems facing the futures and derivatives industry. Per
A recently completed review by the Editor suggests that many of the submissions to The Journal of Futures Markets are on narrow topics which neither reflect the breadth of interests of the readers of the Journal nor address the most important problems facing the futures and derivatives industry. Per
A recently completed review by the Editor suggests that many of the submissions to The Journal of Futures Markets are on narrow topics which neither reflect the breadth of interests of the readers of the Journal nor address the most important problems facing the futures and derivatives industry. Per