✦ LIBER ✦

Invited commentary: Is it a mistake to focus on errors?

✍ Scribed by John D. Birkmeyer

Book ID: 119767437
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 2003
Tongue: English
Weight: 30 KB
Volume: 133
Category: Article
ISSN: 0039-6060
DOI: 10.1067/msy.2003.184

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Memory errors on emotional lures: Is it

Memory errors on emotional lures: Is it possible to mistake a positive stimulus for a negative one?

✍ Huang, Yang-Ming; Yeh, Yei-Yu 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 Taylor and Francis Group 🌐 English ⚖ 194 KB

Is It A Way Out of Crises for White Meat

Is It A Way Out of Crises for White Meat Producers to Focus On Export Strategies During Crisis Times?

✍ Cüneyt Akar; Yener Pazarcık; Yavuz Tansoy Yıldırım 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 Elsevier 🌐 English ⚖ 144 KB

It is a capital mistake to theorize befo

It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data: a response to Eccle's criticism of the OFF theory of research utilization

✍ Atle Fretheim; Signe Flottorp; Andrew D. Oxman 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 122 KB

Major depression is not a diagnosis, it

Major depression is not a diagnosis, it is a departure point to differential diagnosis—clinical and hormonal considerations: (A commentary and elaboration on Antonejevic's paper)

✍ Uriel Halbreich 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 95 KB

Is it going to be SIN? : A European Soci

Is it going to be SIN? : A European Society of Gene Therapy commentary. Phasing-out the clinical use of non self-inactivating murine leukemia virus vectors: initiative on hold

✍ Christian J. Buchholz; Klaus Cichutek 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 52 KB

## Abstract Insertional mutagenesis resulting in a leukaemia‐like lymphoproliferative disease, as observed in the X‐SCID (severe combined immunodeficiency) clinical trial using a γ‐retroviral vector that transferred a functional copy of the defective gene into hematopoietic precursor cells of affec

Reply to “Commentary: Assessment of past

Reply to “Commentary: Assessment of past infiltration fluxes through Yucca Mountain on the basis of the secondary mineral record—is it a viable methodology?” by Y.V. Dublyansky and S.Z. Smirnov

✍ Brian D. Marshall; Leonid A. Neymark; Zell E. Peterman 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 87 KB