Variants of uncertain significance (VUS) in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes potentially affecting coding sequence as well as normal splicing activity have confounded predisposition testing in breast cancer. Here, we apply information theory to analyze BRCA1/2 mRNA splicing mutations categorized as VUS. Th
Intronic alterations in BRCA1 and BRCA2: effect on mRNA splicing fidelity and expression
β Scribed by Xiaowei Chen; Tuyet-Trinh N. Truong; JoEllen Weaver; Betsy A. Bove; Kimberly Cattie; Brock A. Armstrong; Mary B. Daly; Andrew K. Godwin
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2006
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 882 KB
- Volume
- 27
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1059-7794
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Communicated by Haig H. Kazazian
Germline mutations in the human breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 account for the majority of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. In spite of the large number of sequence variants identified in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation analyses, many of these genetic alterations are still classified as variants of unknown significance (VUS). In this study, we evaluated 12 BRCA1/2 intronic variants in order to differentiate their pathogenic or polymorphic effects on the mRNA splicing process. We detected the existence of aberrant splicing in three BRCA1 variants (c.301-2delA/IVS6-2delA, c.44111G4A/IVS711G4A, and c.49861 6T4G/IVS1616T4G) and two BRCA2 variants (c.848711G4A/IVS1911G4A and c.8632-2A4 G/IVS20-2A4G). All but one of the aberrant transcripts arise from mutations affecting the conserved splice acceptor or donor sequences and all would be predicted to result in expression of truncated BRCA1 or BRCA2 proteins. However, we demonstrated that four of these splice-site mutations (i.e., c.301-2delA, c.44111G4A, c.498616T4G, and c.8632-2A4G) with premature termination codons were highly unstable and were unlikely to encode for abundant expression of a mutant protein. Three variants of BRCA1 (c.21213A4G/ IVS513A4G, c.59318A4G/IVS918A4G, and c.4986-20A4G/IVS16-20A4G) and four variants of BRCA2 (c.516-19C4T/IVS6-19C4T, c.7976-4_7976_3delTT/IVS17-4delTT, c.8487119A4G/IVS191 19A4G, and c.9256-18C4A/IVS24-18C4A) in our studies show no effects on the normal splicing process, and they are considered to be benign polymorphic alterations. Our studies help to clarify the aberrant splicing in BRCA1 and BRCA2 as well as provide information that can be used clinically to help counsel breast/ovarian cancer prone families. Hum Mutat 27(5), 427-435, 2006.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract About 4% of all __BRCA1__ and __BRCA2__ alterations reported to the Breast Information Core database are splice site variants. Only a limited number of them have been studied at the RNA level. By __BRCA1__ and __BRCA2__ mutation analysis of breast/ovarian cancer families, we identified
A large number of sequence variants identified in BRCA1 and BRCA2 cannot be distinguished as either disease-causing mutations or neutral variants. These so-called unclassified variants (UVs) include variants that are located in the intronic sequences of BRCA1 and BRCA2. The purpose of this study was
BACKGROUND. BRCA1 and BRCA2 participate in cell cycle progression, apoptosis, and DNA repair pathways. The latter role may be mediated by interaction with DNA recombinase Rad51. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of genotoxic and other cytotoxic agents on expression of DNA damage-
## Abstract The breast cancer susceptibility genes __BRCA1__ and __BRCA2__ are responsible for a large proportion of familial breast and ovarian cancer, yet little is known of how disruptions in the functions of the proteins these genes encode increased cancer risk preferentially in hormoneβdepende