๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

INTRAVENOUS vs INTRAPERITONEAL SENSITIZER: IMPLICATIONS FOR INTRAPERITONEAL PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY

โœ Scribed by ROGER R. PERRY; PAUL D. SMITH; STEVEN EVANS; HARVEY I. PASS

Book ID
114896109
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1991
Tongue
English
Weight
522 KB
Volume
53
Category
Article
ISSN
0031-8655

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

Intraperitoneal photodynamic therapy in
Intraperitoneal photodynamic therapy in the rat: Comparison of toxicity profiles for photofrin and mTHPC
โœ Ruth B. Veenhuizen; Marjan C. Ruevekamp-Helmers; Theo J. M. Helmerhorst; Peter K ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1994 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ French โš– 980 KB

## Abstract Toxicity studies for intraperitoneal photodynamic therapy (IPPDT) were performed in Wag/RijA rats, using specially designed light delivery blocks for proper light distribution and light dosimetry. A recently developed photosensitizer mesotetrahydroxyphenylchlorin (mTHPC), excited at 652

Photodynamic therapy of the canine perit
Photodynamic therapy of the canine peritoneum: Normal tissue response to intraperitoneal and intravenous photofrin followed by 630 nm light
โœ Dr. Z. Tochner; J. B. Mitchell; H. J. Hoekstra; P. Smith; A. M. Deluca; M. Barne ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1991 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 710 KB

A toxicity study was performed in a canine model to explore the feasibility of using intraperitoneal photodynamic therapy for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. Dogs received 1.25 mg/kg Photofrin I1 both intravenously (48 hours) and intraperitoneally (2 hours) before intraperitoneal light trea