✦ LIBER ✦

Intraobserver and interobserver measurements of the anorectal angle and perineal descent in defecography

✍ Scribed by Jeong Seok Choi; Steven D. Wexner; Young Soon Nam; Constantinos Mavrantonis; Mara R. Salum; Takuya Yamaguchi; Eric G. Weiss; Juan J. Nogueras; Cheng Fang Yu

Publisher: Springer
Year: 2000
Tongue: English
Weight: 951 KB
Volume: 43
Category: Article
ISSN: 0012-3706
DOI: 10.1007/bf02236560

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Sex differences in anorectal angle and p

Sex differences in anorectal angle and perineal descent

✍ Skomorowska, Elwira ;Hegedüs, Viktor 📂 Article 📅 1987 🏛 Springer-Verlag 🌐 English ⚖ 177 KB

Intraobserver variation in the radiologi

Intraobserver variation in the radiological measurement of the anorectal angle

✍ Penninckx, F. ;Debruyne, C. ;Lestar, B. ;Kerremans, R. 📂 Article 📅 1991 🏛 Springer-Verlag 🌐 English ⚖ 376 KB

Interobserver and intraobserver reliabil

Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the cervicomedullary angle in a normal adult population

✍ Shenglin Wang; Chao Wang; Peter G. Passias; Gang Li; Ming Yan; Haitao Zhou 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 276 KB

Interobserver and Intraobserver Bias Exi

Interobserver and Intraobserver Bias Exists in the Interpretation of Anal Dysplasia

✍ Patrick Colquhoun; JuanJ. Nogueras; Bruno Dipasquale; Robert Petras; StevenD. We 📂 Article 📅 2003 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 164 KB

NUO 2911 Intraobserver and interobserver

NUO 2911 Intraobserver and interobserver variance in the measurement of ultrasound estimated bladder weight (UEBW)

✍ Yoshio Naya; Hisashi Honjo; Emi Inui; Atushi Ochiai; Osamu Ukimura; Munekado Koj 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 119 KB

Intraobserver and interobserver variatio

Intraobserver and interobserver variation in the histopathological assessment of liver allograft rejection

✍ A. Jake Demetris; Steven H. Belle; John Hart; Klaus Lewin; Jurgen Ludwig; Dale C 📂 Article 📅 1991 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 592 KB

A study to determine the reproducibility of histopathological finding^ and diagnoses of rejection was carried out on a series of 42 liver allograft needle biopsy specimens by five pathologists practicing at four liver transplant centers. Pathologists from each of the four centers read each slide ind