𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Intraluminal versus humoral factors in intestinal cell proliferation

✍ Scribed by A. K. C. Li; B. W. Jeppsson; C. G. Jamieson


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1982
Tongue
English
Weight
462 KB
Volume
69
Category
Article
ISSN
0007-1323

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Since both intraluminal and humoral factors have been implicated in postresectional intestinal hyperplasia, we investigated the relative importance of these factors by using cutaneous parabiotic rats with shared gut. Paired cutaneous parabiosis with a common peritoneal cavity was established in inbred Fischer rats. One month later, in one group of animals one member of the pair had a 64 per cent small bowel resection, while in the control group transection alone was performed. Immediately all the rats underwent intestinal crossover, achieved by anastomosing the proximal small bowel of each rat to the distal small bowel of its partner.

In the jejunum 2 weeks later there was an 18 per cent increase in DNA content and a 26 per cent increase in wet weight in the animals with resection compared with their parabionts (P < 0Β·05). There was no difference between the parabionts without resection and the control animals. Because of the intestinal crossover, the more proximally placed ileum from the rats without resection showed a 53–58 per cent increase in DNA content, 28–29 per cent increase in RNA content and 51–57 per cent increase in wet weight compared with the normally placed ileum from the partners that had resection and with the control (P < 0Β·001). There was no difference between the control and the normally placed ileum from the animals that had resection. The position of the ileum after resection appeared to be the major influence on hyperplasia, since no measurable difference in nucleic acid contents was detected between the ileum of the animals with resection and the control. However, humoral factors do operate locally and may play a permissive role because the jejunum of the animals with resection showed DNA increase when compared with the control.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


The superior prognostic value of humoral
✍ Jan Lehmann; Margitta Retz; Nils NΓΌrnberg; Uta SchnΓΆckel; Uta Raffenberg; Matthi πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2004 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 167 KB

## Abstract ## BACKGROUND The American Joint Committee on Cancer and the Union Internationale Contre le Cancer have acknowledged routine laboratory parameters, such as serum calcium, alkaline phosphatase, hemoglobin, and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), as predictors of survival in patien

Factors influencing endothelial cell pro
✍ Robert T. Wall; Laurence A. Harker; Leonard J. Quadracci; Gary E. Striker πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1978 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 734 KB

## Abstract The relative roles of blood cell products and plasma factors on endothelial cell proliferation were evaluated by studying the proliferative response of human umbilical vein endothelial cells to cell free plasma derived serum (CFPDS), whole blood serum (WBS), platelet released factors, f

Cell proliferation in the intestinal epi
✍ Marshall, J. A. ;Dixon, K. E. πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1978 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 849 KB

## Abstract Light microscope, electron microscope and autoradiographic techniques were used to determine whether, in the small intestinal epithelium of feeding tadpoles of __Xenopus laevis__, proliferation is limited to particular cells or to particular regions. Mitotic figures were classified as a

The role of growth factors in gastrointe
✍ Malcolm R. Alison; Catherine E. Sarraf πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1994 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 977 KB

## Abstract The epithelial lining of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract is in a state of continuous cell renewal, and the proliferating and differentiating/differentiated cell populations are spatially clearly demarcated. Members of the epidermal growth factor (EGF) family of peptides, the trefoil pep