๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Intragroup social influence processes in intergroup behavior

โœ Scribed by Eddy Van Avermaet; Herman Buelens; Norbert Vanbeselaere; Griet Van Vaerenbergh


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1999
Tongue
English
Weight
112 KB
Volume
29
Category
Article
ISSN
0046-2772

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


In line with a social-support-for-shared-self-interest interpretation of competitive intergroup behavior Schopler, Insko, Graetz, Drigotas, Smith and Dahl (1993) observed that, in the face of consistent cooperative outgroup behavior, two ingroup members behaved competitively when this strategy had been suggested by another (role-playing) ingroup member. Because a comparable amount of competitive PDG-choosing was observed in a no-suggestion condition with two subjects and one neutral role player (single no-suggestion condition), Schopler et al. assumed that the two subjects, motivated by greed, each initiated and supported competitive suggestions. Within the boundaries of Schopler et al.'s research paradigm, the present experiment aimed to test this assumption by adding a no-suggestion cooperative feedback condition with two neutral role players, rendering impossible any form of explicit social support. In this double no-suggestion condition a signiยฎcant reduction of competitive responding was observed, compared to a single no-suggestion condition. Additionally it was observed that the single no-suggestion condition yielded less competition than a manipulated (explicit) competitive suggestion condition. Finally, the new condition still produced more competition than a manipulated (explicit) cooperative suggestion condition. As a whole, our results are in line with predictions derived from the social-support-forshared-self-interest-hypothesis. Nevertheless, alternative interpretations, calling for further research, are also proposed.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


The neighbor effect: Other groups influe
โœ Kate C. Baker; Filippo Aureli ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1996 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 628 KB

While intercommunity interactions are well documented in wild chimpanzees, the influence of neighboring captive groups on social behavior has not been investigated. This study examined the influence of vocalizations and noisy displays produced in neighboring groups (i.e., "neighbor vocalization") on

Behavioral and social cognitive processe
โœ Anthony D. Pellegrini; Mark J. Van Ryzin; Cary Roseth; Catherine Bohn-Gettler; D ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2011 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 137 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

This longitudinal, naturalistic study addressed behavioral and social cognitive processes implicated in preschool children's social dominance. In the first objective, we examined the degree to which peer aggression, affiliation, and postaggression reconciliation predicted social dominance across a s

Trust, influence, and convergence of beh
โœ Zhengzheng Pan ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2010 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 502 KB

I propose a social learning framework where agents repeatedly take the weighted average of all agents' current opinions in forming their own for the next period. They also update the influence weights that they place on each other. It is proven that both opinions and the influence weights are conver