𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Intimate Partner Violence Control Scale: Development and Initial Testing

✍ Scribed by Linda K. Bledsoe; Bibhuti K. Sar

Publisher
Springer
Year
2011
Tongue
English
Weight
233 KB
Volume
26
Category
Article
ISSN
0885-7482

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

Testing posttraumatic stress as a mediat
Testing posttraumatic stress as a mediator of physical, sexual, and psychological intimate partner violence and substance problems among women
✍ Tami P. Sullivan; Courtenay E. Cavanaugh; Julia D. Buckner; Donald Edmondson πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› Springer 🌐 English βš– 145 KB

This study examined whether posttraumatic stress specifically resulting from intimate partner violence (IPVrelated posttraumatic stress) mediated relationships between types of IPV and drug and alcohol problems among 212 women currently experiencing IPV. Six-month prevalence was high for drug use (4

The informal social control of intimate
The informal social control of intimate partner violence against women: Exploring personal attitudes and perceived neighborhood social cohesion
✍ Victoria Frye πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2007 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 151 KB

## Abstract Intimate partner violence against women is a major public health and social problem. However, our understanding of how the geographic community or neighborhood influences its distribution is underdeveloped. In contrast, there is accumulating evidence that neighborhood characteristics, s

Development and testing of the velicer a
Development and testing of the velicer attitudes toward violence scale: evidence for a four-factor model
✍ Craig A. Anderson; Arlin J. Benjamin Jr.; Phillip K. Wood; Angelica M. Bonacci πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2006 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 206 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

## Abstract The factor structure of the Velicer Attitudes Toward Violence Scale [VATVS; Velicer, Huckel and Hansen, 1989] was examined in three studies. Study 1 (__n__=460 undergraduates) found a poor fit for a hierarchical five‐factor model earlier advanced by Velicer et al. [1989], but a good fit