Background: 'Systematic reviews' have come to be recognized as the most rigorous method of summarizing confusing and often contradictory primary research in a transparent and reproducible manner. Their greatest impact has been in the summarization of epidemiological literature-particularly that rela
Interventions Encouraging the Use of Systematic Reviews in Clinical Decision-Making: A Systematic Review
β Scribed by Laure Perrier; Kelly Mrklas; Sasha Shepperd; Maureen Dobbins; K. Ann McKibbon; Sharon E. Straus
- Book ID
- 107414161
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2010
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 240 KB
- Volume
- 26
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0884-8734
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract Clinical librarianship (CL), currently receiving renewed interest worldβwide, seeks to provide qualityβfiltered information to health professionals at the point of need to support clinical decisionβmaking. This review builds upon the work of Cimpl (__Bulletin of the Medical Library Asso
Artificial neural networks have featured in a wide range of medical journals, often with promising results. This paper reports on a systematic review that was conducted to assess the benefit of artificial neural networks (ANNs) as decision making tools in the field of cancer. The number of clinical