Interstate banking and the payments system
โ Scribed by Allen N. Berger; David B. Humphrey
- Publisher
- Springer
- Year
- 1988
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 883 KB
- Volume
- 1
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0920-8550
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Interstate banking will improve the efficiency of the payments system. This will occur because the number of handlings for multiple-bank payments (transit items) will fall and because some multiplebank payments will be transformed into single-bank payments (on-us items). These effects are simulated using data on the current cross-section relationship between banking structure and check clearing patterns in a multinomial logit model. The Federal Reserve, which currently processes almost one-third of all checks, is predicted to lose 43 to 60 percent of its market share. The annual impact is expected to be gradual, however, since interstate banking will be phased in and because of offsetting growth in the total check clearing market.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
Returns to bidders are examined for 108 bank acquisitions over the 1981-1987 period. These returns provide evidence on the conflict-of-interest hypothesis and the hubris hypothesis, both of which predict negative returns to bidders, versus the shareholder wealth maximization model that predicts posi
The Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994 (IBBEA) removes two longstanding impediments to the efficient evolution of the U.S. financial system. The Act breaks a federal logjam on interstate banking and branching. After a one-year transition period, IBBEA effectively rep
The Financial Center Development Act (FCDA) of Delaware was signed into law in March 1981, to permit out-of-state bank holding companies (BHCs) to establish special purpose banking subsidiaries within the state of Delaware. The FCDA can be viewed as part of the growing national trend toward intersta